The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability
Abstract
Over the past half century, a discourse emphasizing environmental constraints and limits has both informed and provided many valuable ways of responding to complex environmental problems and has strongly shaped green building practices and associated environmental assessment methods. This paper delineates the concept of ‘regenerative sustainability’ – a net-positive approach to sustainability that is rooted in the notion of ‘procedural sustainability’ and a particular stream of constructivist social theory. The paper contrasts this to the concept of ‘regenerative development and design’ which, although having many commonalities, is based on different philosophical underpinnings. Since the origins of regenerative sustainability and regenerative design lie primarily in the social and ecological domains respectively, understanding their relationship is of importance in formulating approaches for the successful co-evolution of human and natural systems. The paper describes this relationship between regenerative sustainability and regenerative design, including a discussion of some of the key points of convergence and divergence between them, and concludes with an exploration of the practical implications of the regenerative sustainability concept.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Hardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Earth and Us · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,174
Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03180-140232 · Cited by 7,187
The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4463 · Cited by 7,046
Hardin, G. (2009) · Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research · doi:10.1080/19390450903037302 · Cited by 6,367
Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing
Reckwitz, A. (2002) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/13684310222225432 · Cited by 5,544
World Commission on environment and development
HARIEMBRUNDTLAND, G. (1985) · Environmental Policy and Law · doi:10.1016/s0378-777x(85)80040-8 · Cited by 4,789
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.
Baber, Z., Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076669 · Cited by 4,406
The Limits to Growth: A report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972) · doi:10.1349/ddlp.1 · Cited by 4,268
Cited by
Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016 · Cited by 1,599
What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?
Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009 · Cited by 1,378
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, J., & Cole, R. J.
- Venue
- Building Research & Information
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-143
- ISSN
- 0961-3218 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4321
- OpenAlex
- W2002096175
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 24.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09613218.2014.979082
- The paper
- Robinson, J., & Cole, R. J. (2015). Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability. Building Research & Information. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.979082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.