The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolving opportunities for providing thermal comfort
Open accessAbstract
The building industry needs a fundamental paradigm shift in its notion of comfort, to find low-energy ways of creating more thermally dynamic and non-uniform environments that bring inhabitants pleasure. Strategies for providing enriched thermal environments must be conjoined with reducing energy; these are inseparable for any building striving for high performance. The objective of current comfort standards is to have no more than 20% of occupants dissatisfied, yet buildings are not reaching even that scant goal. A significant energy cost is incurred by the current practice of controlling buildings within a narrow range of temperatures (often over-cooling in the summer). If building designers and operators can find efficient ways to allow building temperatures to float over a wider range, while affording occupants individual control of comfort, the potential for energy savings is enormous. Five new ways of thinking, or paradigm shifts, are presented for designing or operating buildings to provide enhanced thermal experiences. They are supported by examples of research conducted by the Center for the Built Environment, and include shifts from centralized to personal control, from still to breezy air movement, from thermal neutrality to delight, from active to passive design, and from system disengagement to improved feedback loops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hoyt, T., Arens, E., & Zhang, H. (2015) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.09.010 · Cited by 607
Self-citationRevisiting an old hypothesis of human thermal perception: alliesthesia
de Dear, R. (2011) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613218.2011.552269 · Cited by 333
Cited by
Ten questions concerning well-being in the built environment
Altomonte, S., Allen, J., Bluyssen, P. M., Brager, G., Heschong, L., Loder, A., Schiavon, S., Veitch, J. A., Wang, L., & Wargocki, P. (2020) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106949 · Cited by 303
Self-citationWhat is wrong with energy efficiency?
Shove, E. (2018) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746 · Cited by 300
Healthy excursions outside the thermal comfort zone
van Marken Lichtenbelt, W., Hanssen, M., Pallubinsky, H., Kingma, B., & Schellen, L. (2017) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613218.2017.1307647 · Cited by 109
The associations between thermal variety and health: Implications for space heating energy use
Kennard, H. R., Huebner, G. M., Shipworth, D., & Oreszczyn, T. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236116 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Brager, G., Zhang, H., & Arens, E.
- Venue
- Building Research & Information
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-01-28
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 274-287
- ISSN
- 0961-3218 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4321
- OpenAlex
- W2033726393
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolving opportunities for providing thermal comfort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09613218.2015.993536
- The paper
- Brager, G., Zhang, H., & Arens, E. (2015). Evolving opportunities for providing thermal comfort. Building Research & Information. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.993536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.