Not just any toilet–women’s solutions to sanitation in informal settlements in Nairobi.
Abstract
Evidence suggests sanitation development is more effective when women are involved. The purpose of this study was to provide women with an opportunity to share their perspectives and solutions to sanitation in informal settlements. Data were collected through 55 in-depth interviews with women in Mathare Valley informal settlement in Nairobi, Kenya. The most common solution was to build more toilets, but women had a variety of suggestions – including gender-specific solutions. Findings from this study suggest that it is imperative to start addressing women-specific burdens associated with sanitation in informal settlements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
General safety concerns were widely noted, including feeling unsafe collecting water or using sanitation facilities at night, and when toilets lack doors, locks, lighting, or are far; safety issues were particularly intense for adolescent girls, young women, and minorities.
“General safety concerns were widely noted, [100, 119, 123, 139, 143, 147, 171, 177, 182, 186, 188, 191, 201, 202, 223, 226-229, 233, 238, 240, 241, 251, 255, 257] including feeling unsafe collecting water, [100, 119, 177] or using sanitation facilities at night, [168, 171, 190, 229, 255-257] and when toilets lack doors, locks, lighting, or are far [171, 190, 214, 223, 239-241, 252, 255].Safety”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [147]
Limited household income has forced women to prioritize needs like food over sanitation; women in Kenya and India adapted by using preferred pay-per-use locations less often or strategically, like for defecation only.
“Limited household income has forced women to prioritize needs like food over sanitation, whether investing in or paying to use toilets [135,147,186].Women in Kenya [240, 270] and India [187] adapted by using preferred pay-per-use locations less often or strategically, like for defecation only [187,240,270].”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [147]
Limited income and asset access and control, including over land, constrained women's access to sanitation and limited independent decision-making about latrine construction; women reported using public pay-per-use toilets and incurring higher costs than men due to more frequent need.
“Similarly, limited income and asset access and control, including over land, constrained women's access to sanitation [119, 124, 125, 135, 147, 168, 171, 174, 186, 187, 191, 217, 239, 240, 270] and limited independent decision-making about latrine construction [119, 124, 135].Women reported using public pay-per-use toilets [168, 171, 174, 227, 239, 270] and incurring higher costs than men due to”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [147]
Cites
The Urban Crisis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Threat to Human Security and Sustainable Development
Hove, M., Ngwerume, E. T., & Muchemwa, C. (2013) · Stability International Journal of Security and Development · doi:10.5334/sta.ap · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Socio-economic aspects of improved sanitation in slums: A review
Isunju, J. B., Schwartz, K., Schouten, M. A., Johnson, W. P., & van Dijk, M. P. (2011) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2011.03.008 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Rahman, M. M., Hoque, M. A., & Makinoda, S. (2011) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-011-9375-3 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Slum Sanitation and the Social Determinants of Women’s Health in Nairobi, Kenya
Corburn, J., & Hildebrand, C. (2015) · Journal of Environmental and Public Health · doi:10.1155/2015/209505 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
McGranahan, G. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.008 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Why gender matters in the solution towards safe sanitation? Reflections from rural India.
Khanna, T., & Das, M. (2016) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2015.1062905 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Women’s role in sanitation decision making in rural coastal Odisha, India.
Routray, P., Torondel, B., Clasen, T., & Schmidt, W.-P. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178042 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Combining sanitation and women’s participation in water supply: An example from Rajasthan.
O'Reilly, K. (2010) · Development in Practice · doi:10.1080/09614520903436976 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Corburn, J., & Karanja, I. (2016) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dau100 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
From toilet insecurity to toilet security: creating safe sanitation for women and girls
O’Reilly, K. (2015) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1122 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Decision-making on shared sanitation in the informal settlements of Kisumu, Kenya
Simiyu, S. N., Swilling, M., & Cairncross, S. (2017) · International Journal of Environmental Health Research · doi:10.1080/09603123.2017.1350261 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Tales of shit: Community-Led Total Sanitation in Africa
Bongartz, P., Musyoki, S. M., Milligan, A., et al. (2010) · Figshare · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Men, masculinity, and community development in Kenyan slums
Izugbara, C. O., Tikkanen, R. H., & Barron, K. (2014) · Community Development · doi:10.1080/15575330.2013.868816 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Lundine, J., Kovačič, P., & Poggiali, L. (2012) · Children Youth and Environments · doi:10.7721/chilyoutenvi.22.2.0214 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Women and sanitation: Urban reality experiences of government programmes, NGOs and CBOs
Khosla, R. (2000) · Social Change · doi:10.1177/004908570003000213 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis
Caruso, B. A., Conrad, A., Patrick, M., Owens, A., Kviten, K., Zarella, O., Rogers, H., & Sinharoy, S. S. (2022) · PLOS Water · doi:10.1371/journal.pwat.0000026 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
- Authors
- Winter, S., Barchi, F., & Dzombo, M. N.
- Corresponding author
- Winter, Samantha
- Venue
- Development in Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-09-24
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-25
- ISSN
- 0961-4524 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-9213
- OpenAlex
- W2894332414
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development in Practice (publishedVersion)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Security Education Program (David L. Boren Fellowship)
- PEO International (PEO Scholar Award)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Keywords
- sanitation, informal settlements, women's perspectives, toilets, women's burden, Nairobi, participatory approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review