The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: Incidence, impairments and risk factors
Abstract
PURPOSE: Describing the epidemiology of cerebral palsy (CP), its impairments and risk factors. METHOD: Literature review 1965-2004. Search terms: Cerebral palsy, incidence, prevalence, impairments, risk factors. RESULTS: In the last 40 years the prevalence of CP has risen to well above 2.0 per 1000 life births. In this time span the proportion of low-birthweight infants rose, the proportion of diplegia decreased, while the proportion of hemiplegia increased. CP is more prevalent in more deprived socio-economic populations. The majority of people with CP have the spastic syndrome of which the diplegic group is the smallest. Dependent on the subgroup of CP, 25-80% have additional impairments. A large proportion has some kind of cognitive impairment; the prevalence varies with the type of CP and especially increases when epilepsy is present. Epilepsy is present in 20-40%; it is most common among the hemi- and tetraplegics. Sensibility of the hands is impaired in about half. Chronic pain is reported by more than a quarter of the adults. Up to 80% have at least some impairment of speech. Low visual acuity is reported in almost three-quarters of all children. Half of all children have gastrointestinal and feeding problems. Stunted growth occurs in a quarter, while under- or overweight problems are present in half of the children. Almost 70% of people with spastic CP have abnormal brain CT findings; abnormal cranial ultrasounds is most strongly associated with hemiplegia, normal cranial ultrasounds with diplegia. The most important risk factors for CP are low birthweight, intrauterine infections and multiple gestation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frampton, I., Yude, C., & Goodman, R. (1998) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01273.x · Cited by 68
Cited by
Developmental brain dysfunction: revival and expansion of old concepts based on new genetic evidence
Moreno-De-Luca, A., Myers, S. M., Challman, T. D., Moreno-De-Luca, D., Evans, D. W., & Ledbetter, D. H. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70011-5 · Cited by 330
McIntyre, S., Morgan, C., Walker, K., & Novak, I. (2011) · Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/ddrr.1106 · Cited by 304
Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD, Epilepsy, and Cerebral Palsy in Norwegian Children
Surén, P., Bakken, I. J., Aase, H., Chin, R., Gunnes, N., Lie, K. K., Magnus, P., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Schjølberg, S., Øyen, A.-S., et al. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3217 · Cited by 248
Pousada, M., Guillamón, N., Hernández-Encuentra, E., Muñoz, E., Redolar, D., Boixadós, M., & Gómez-Zúñiga, B. (2013) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-013-9332-6 · Cited by 155
Bonnechère, B., Jansen, B., Omelina, L., Degelaen, M., Wermenbol, V., Rooze, M., & Van Sint Jan, S. (2014) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.04.016 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Odding, E., Roebroeck, M. E., & Stam, H. J.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 183-191
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W2070508173
- Cited by
- 1,082
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: Incidence, impairments and risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09638280500158422
- The paper
- Odding, E., Roebroeck, M. E., & Stam, H. J. (2006). The epidemiology of cerebral palsy: Incidence, impairments and risk factors. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500158422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.