Cited by 69Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersReading and Literacy Development

The Prevalence and Correlates of Specific Learning Difficulties in a Representative Sample of Children with Hemiplegia

Frampton, I., Yude, C., Goodman, R.·1998·British Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with hemiplegia have cerebral palsy affecting one side of the body due to damage to the opposite side of the brain. An investigation of the association between hemiplegia and specific learning difficulties (SpLD) provides a unique window on body-mind links and left brain/right brain differences. AIMS: The present study investigated the prevalence and correlates of SpLDs in children with hemiplegia. SAMPLE: A representative sample of 149 London children with hemiplegia aged between 6 and 10 included 59 children whose cognitive abilities and predicted academic ability were within the average range. METHODS: SpLDs were defined by ability-achievement discrepancy analysis. Differences between children with and without SpLDs were explored with a between-groups design. RESULTS: Children with hemiplegia had significantly more SpLDs than expected, with 36 per cent of these children having at least one SpLD. Children with and without SpLDs were similar in intelligence and demographic background, but the children with SpLDs had significantly more severe neurological impairments and a significantly higher rate of emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBDs) than comparison children. CONCLUSIONS: Three typical case studies are described and recommendations made for the early identification and remediation of SpLDs in children with hemiplegia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01273.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frampton, I., Yude, C., & Goodman, R.
Affiliations
Maudsley Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Frampton, I.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-03
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
39-51
ISSN
  • 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8279
OpenAlex
W2015278235
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
hemiplegia, learning disabilities, cerebral palsy, children, prevalence, ability-achievement discrepancy, emotional and behavioral problems, neurological deficit, hemispheric lateralization, early detection, remediation
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Hemiplegia, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review