Cited by 42Climate Change and GeoengineeringSpace exploration and regulationAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Highly decentralized solar geoengineering

Open access
Reynolds, Jesse L., Wagner, Gernot·2020·Environmental Politics

Abstract

Nonstate actors appear to have increasing power, in part due to new technologies that alter actors’ capacities and incentives. Although solar geoengineering is typically conceived of as centralized and state-deployed, we explore highly decentralized solar geoengineering. Done perhaps through numerous small high-altitude balloons, it could be provided by nonstate actors such as environmentally motivated nongovernmental organizations or individuals. Conceivably tolerated or even covertly sponsored by states, highly decentralized solar geoengineering could move presumed action from the state arena to that of direct intervention by nonstate actors, which could in turn, disrupt international politics and pose novel challenges for technology and environmental policy. We conclude that this method appears technically possible, economically feasible, and potentially politically disruptive. Decentralization could, in principle, make control by states difficult, perhaps even rendering such control prohibitively costly and complex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09644016.2019.1648169

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A highly political, uncoordinated, and decentralized 'Wild West' deployment scenario, with unclear direct impacts, is possible.

    “Given the high variance of potential SAI objectives and potential deployment configurations, a highly political, uncoordinated, and decentralized (Reynolds and Wagner, 2020) 'Wild West' deployment scenario, with unclear direct impacts, is possible.”

    From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as Reynolds and Wagner, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reynolds, J. L., & Wagner, G.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Wagner, Gernot
Venue
Environmental Politics
Published
2019-07-29
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
917-933
ISSN
  • 0964-4016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-8934
OpenAlex
W2964530838
Cited by
42
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 20
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Politics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Harvard’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program (na)
  • Emmett/Frankel Fellowship in Environmental Law and Policy at University of California, Los Angeles (na)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
solar geoengineering, high-altitude balloons, non-state actors, non-governmental organizations, international politics, environmental policy, technology policy, geoengineering governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review