Cited by 427Public Procurement and PolicyInnovation Policy and R&DPublic Policy and Administration Research

Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement

Open access
Uyarra, Elvira, Flanagan, Kieron·2010·European Planning Studies

Abstract

Public procurement accounts for a significant proportion of overall demand for goods and services and is increasingly seen as an attractive and feasible instrument for furthering the goals of innovation policy. However, public procurement is already expected to address a wide range of social goals. Much of the current debate about harnessing procurement to promote innovation draws upon a limited set of examples which are not representative of the bulk of public purchasing and tend to downplay diversity in procurement practices and in the types of goods and services procured. They also downplay diversity in the nature of innovations and in the range of ways that procurement can impact upon innovation. A one-size-fits-all model is unlikely to work across all procurement contexts yet all types of public procurement are likely to have impacts upon innovation by shaping the demand environment in which suppliers innovate and compete. We propose a framework and typology based on the nature of the goods and services procured in order to explore the potential impacts upon markets and innovation of each. We conclude that public purchasing should first and foremost remain concerned with proximate public policy goals and that, rather than trying to co-opt public procurement into the innovation policy toolbox, policy-makers should focus on promoting innovation-friendly practices across all types of procurement at all levels of governance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09654310903343567

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The public sector tends to rely on existing products instead of promoting innovation.

    “These are great challenges, considering the tendency of the public sector to rely on existing products instead of promoting innovation (Uyarra and Flanagan, 2010).”

    From Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture (2023) · cites this paper as Uyarra and Flanagan, 2010

    The Abstract discusses how public procurement can affect innovation and recommends innovation-friendly practices, but it does not say that the public sector tends to rely on existing products. Searches for that phrasing and for buying off-the-shelf products returned no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Uyarra, Elvira
Venue
European Planning Studies
Published
2010-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
123-143
ISSN
  • 0965-4313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5944
OpenAlex
W2050318169
Cited by
427
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
26.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Planning Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
public procurement, innovation policy, demand-side innovation, supplier competition, governance levels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review