CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 405EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningSecond Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engagement with language: interrogating a construct

Open access
Svalberg, Agneta Marie-Louise·2009·Language Awareness
DOI 10.1080/09658410903197264
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In ‘Language awareness and language learning’ (Svalberg, 2007 Svalberg, A. M.-L. 2007. Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4): 287–308. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) I concluded that the otherwise diverse and multidisciplinary field of language awareness (LA) is given coherence by its focus on engagement with language. I argued that LA is seen as active and not merely as a state of conscious awareness or sensitivity. This paper goes one step further by developing and testing the construct. It discusses what engagement with language might consist of and contrasts with and how it can be identified. Cognitive, social, and affective aspects of engagement, including notions such as attention, autonomy, and agency, are posited. Having arrived at first at a working definition and then an expanded and refined definition, the construct is applied to some classroom and student interview data. Some tentative conclusions about English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) students' engagement with language, what motivates, facilitates, and hinders it, are drawn. The main purpose of the paper is, however, to try and determine the usefulness or otherwise of the construct as such, how it relates to other constructs in the literature, and where it might be taken in future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658410903197264

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Armstrong, K. and Svalberg, A. M.L. Implementing the Adult ESOL Core Curriculum; subversion and compliance. Paper presented at Interrogating Third Spaces Conference (ITS 2005). University of Leicester, UK.
  2. Swain, M. Languaging, agency and collaboration in second language learning. Plenary address at BAAL Language Learning and Teaching SIG Conference: Language Use, Language Processing and Language Learning. April, University of Southampton, UK.
  3. Willis J., 1992, Advances in spoken discourse, 162

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Svalberg, A. M.-L.
Affiliations
University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Svalberg, Agneta Marie-Louise
Venue
Language Awareness
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-10-21
Volume
18
Issue
3-4
Pages
242-258
ISSN
  • 0965-8416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7565
DOI
10.1080/09658410903197264
OpenAlex
W1966123699
Cited by
405
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
31.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Language Awareness (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
construct definition, language learning, cognitive engagement, social engagement, emotional engagement, learner autonomy, learner agency, attention, ESL learners, motivation, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review