Sharing versus collaborative economy: how to align ICT developments and the SDGs in tourism?
Open accessAbstract
Great hopes have been placed in the sharing economy to provide a new business model based on peer-to-peer (P2P) exchanges of underutilized assets. As a model, the sharing economy has been expected to make significant contributions to sustainability, providing new opportunities for entrepreneurship, more sustainable use of resources, and consumer co-operation in tight economic networks. However, in recent years, digital platforms have turned into the most important actors in the global sharing economy, turning global corporations, such as AirBnB, Booking, or TripAdvisor into intermediaries controlling and profiting from most transactions. Focused on accommodation, this paper conceptualizes the sharing economy in comparison to the wider collaborative economy, and discusses its social, economic, environmental, and political impacts in comparison to the sustainable development goals. It concludes that the sharing economy has great potential to make very significant contributions to sustainability, though the model is increasingly being replaced by the collaborative economy, which performs as an extension and acceleration of neoliberal economic practices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com
Edelman, B. G., & Luca, M. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2377353 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
O'Rourke, D., & Lollo, N. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ragazou, K., Garefalakis, A., Papademetriou, C., & Passas, I. (2023) · International Conference on Tourism Research · doi:10.34190/ictr.6.1.1066 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A cross-sector exploration of the barriers to customer satisfaction in the sharing economy
Panniello, U., Natalicchio, A., Ardito, L., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114862 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gössling, S., & Michael Hall, C.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Department of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurship, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Corresponding author
- Gössling, Stefan
- Venue
- Journal of Sustainable Tourism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-01-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-96
- ISSN
- 0966-9582 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7646
- OpenAlex
- W2909796576
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 43.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Sustainable Tourism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Keywords
- sharing economy, Sustainable Development Goals, tourism, peer-to-peer platforms, digital platforms, Airbnb, neoliberalism, sustainability, accommodation, business models, social impact, environmental impact
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review