Cited by 456Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A history of blood glucose meters and their role in self-monitoring of diabetes mellitus

Clarke, S. F., Foster, J. R.·2012·British Journal of Biomedical Science

Abstract

Self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) systems have the potential to play an important role in the management of diabetes and in the reduction of risk of serious secondary clinical complications. This review describes the transition from simple urine sugar screening tests to sophisticated meter and reagent strip systems to monitor blood glucose. Significant developments in design and technology over the past four decades are described since the first meter was introduced in 1970. Factors that have influenced this evolution and the challenges to improve analytical performance are discussed. Current issues in the role of SMBG from the clinical, patient and manufacturer perspectives, notably adherence, costs and regulations, are also considered.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09674845.2012.12002443

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. IBMS History Committee, 2005, From matula to mass spectrometry: a history of urine tests in the investigation of human disease.
  2. Benedict SR., 1908, J Biol Chem, 277, e5
  3. Walter B., 1983, Anal Chem, 55, 498A
  4. Sonntag O., 1993, Analysis with carrier-bound reagents, 1
  5. Hill JB, 1961, J Lab Clin Med, 57, 970
  6. Cheah JS, 1974, Singapore Med J, 15, 51
  7. Thai AC, 1981, Singapore Med J, 22, 275
  8. 1982, Clin Chem, 28, 2448
  9. Forest RD, 1987, Diabetes Res, 6, 119
  10. American Diabetes Association, 1996, Diabetes Care, 19, 62
  11. Devreese K, 1993, Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem, 31, 829
  12. International Organisation for Standardisation, 2003, In vitro diagnostic test systems for blood glucose monitoring systems for self testing in managing diabetes mellitus.
  13. American Diabetes Association, 2010, Diabetes Care, 33, Sll
  14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009, Type 2 diabetes: neiver agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes (Partial update of CG66)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 456

Metadata

Authors
Clarke, S. F., & Foster, J. R.
Affiliations
Institute of Biomedical Science (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Biomedical Science
Published
2012-01
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
83-93
ISSN
0967-4845 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W103326292
Cited by
456
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 6
FWCI
15.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Biomedical Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
blood glucose meters, self-monitoring of blood glucose, diabetes mellitus, test strips, analytical performance, patient adherence, cost, regulation, diabetes management
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Equipment Design, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Reproducibility of Results, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review