Wealthy, urban, educated. Who is represented in population surveys of women’s menstrual hygiene management?
Open accessAbstract
Inadequate menstrual hygiene presents a barrier to women's dignity and health. Recent attention to this marginalised challenge has resulted in the first national assessments of menstrual practices. Intuitively, surveys require women to have had a recent menses to be eligible. This study seeks to determine if there are demographic differences between women who are eligible and ineligible to answer questions about their menstrual hygiene during these assessments. Secondary analyses were undertaken on nationally or state representative data collected by the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 survey programme across eight countries (Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Niger, Nigeria, and Uganda). Female respondents were included in the study and compared on whether they had a menstrual period within the past three months and thus were eligible to answer questions regarding menstrual practices. On average, 29% of surveyed women across samples were ineligible to be asked menstrual hygiene questions. Higher levels of education, wealth, and urban residence were associated with higher odds of eligibility. Young and unmarried women were also more likely to be eligible. Demographic differences between eligible and ineligible women were consistent across all countries. Wealthy, urban, and educated women are more likely to be eligible to answer survey questions about menstrual hygiene. While population surveys may be representative of menstruating women, proportions of menstrual hygiene practices reported underrepresent the experiences of more vulnerable groups. These groups are likely to have greater struggles with menstrual hygiene when they are menstruating.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an analysis of data across eight countries (including India) from the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 survey programme, Hennegan et al (2018) found that women who were wealthy, urban, educated, young, and unmarried were more likely to be eligible to answer questions about menstruation, resulting in an underrepresentation of data from rural, older, less educated, and married women
“In an analysis of data across eight countries (including India) from the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 survey programme, Hennegan et al (2018) found that women who were wealthy, urban, educated, young, and unmarried were more likely to be eligible to answer questions about menstruation, resulting in an underrepresentation of data from rural, older, less educated, and married women”
From ’It’s like a burden on the head’: Redefining adequate menstrual hygiene management throughout women’s varied life stages in Odisha, India. (2019) · cites this paper as [70]
Outside of a few key papers that highlight the menstrual experiences of women in the workplace, emergency context, or vaginal bleeding throughout the life course, experiences of menstruation among adult women and outside of school settings remains underexplored.
“Outside of a few key papers that highlight the menstrual experiences of women in the workplace, emergency context, or vaginal bleeding throughout the life course, experiences of menstruation among adult women and outside of school settings remains underexplored [38, 39, 43, 70].”
From ’It’s like a burden on the head’: Redefining adequate menstrual hygiene management throughout women’s varied life stages in Odisha, India. (2019) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect
Victora, C. G., Bahl, R., Barros, A. J. D., França, G. V. A., Horton, S., Krasevec, J., Murch, S., Sankar, M. J., Walker, N., & Rollins, N. C. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01024-7 · Cited by 8,040 · see citing works
Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Chowdhury, R., Sinha, B., Sankar, M. J., Taneja, S., Bhandari, N., Rollins, N., Bahl, R., & Martines, J. (2015) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.13102 · Cited by 1,143 · see citing works
Hennegan, J., & Montgomery, P. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146985 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Self-citationManaging menstruation in the workplace: An overlooked issue in low- and middle income countries
Sommer, M., Chandraratna, S., Cavill, S., Mahon, T., & Phillips-Howard, P. (2016) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0379-8 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Zimmerman, L., Olson, H., PMA2020 Principal Investigators Group, Tsui, A., & Radloff, S. (2017) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/sifp.12031 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Treatment of vaginal bleeding irregularities induced by progestin only contraceptives
Abdel‐Aleem, H., d’Arcangues, C., Vogelsong, K. M., Gaffield, M. L., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003449.pub5 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Amenorrhea: evaluation and treatment.
Master-Hunter, T., & Heiman, D. L. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Students’ Perceptions and Doubts About Menstruation in Developing Countries: A Case Study From India
Chothe, V., Khubchandani, J., Seabert, D., Asalkar, M., Rakshe, S., Firke, A., Midha, I., & Simmons, R. (2014) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839914525175 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
McCallum, E. B., & Peterson, Z. D. (2012) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.658923 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Alvergne, A., Stevens, R., & Gurmu, E. (2017) · Contraception and Reproductive Medicine · doi:10.1186/s40834-017-0052-7 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Sommer, M., Figueroa, C., Kwauk, C., Jones, M., & Fyles, N. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.09.008 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Khan, S. M., Bain, R. E. S., Lunze, K., Unalan, T., Beshanski-Pedersen, B., Slaymaker, T., Johnston, R., & Hancioglu, A. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189089 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Ameade, E. P. K., & Majeed, S. F. (2015) · Journal of Health Education Research & Development · doi:10.4172/2380-5439.1000143 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Nia Project: Baseline report
Muthengi, E. N., Farris, E., & Austrian, K. (2017) · doi:10.31899/pgy8.1041 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Treatment of vaginal bleeding irregularities induced by progestin only contraceptives.
Abdel‐Aleem, H., d’Arcangues, C., Vogelsong, K. K., et al. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003449.pub3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [4]Ministry of Water Supply Sanitation, Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council. National policy consultation workshop on menstrual hygiene management. Nepal: Government of Nepal in collaboration with WSSCC; 2017 [cited 2018 Jan]. Available from: http://wsscc.org/resources-feed/national-policy-consultation-workshop-menstrual-hygiene-management/
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rossouw, L., & Ross, H. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18052571 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
MacRae, E. R., Clasen, T., Dasmohapatra, M., & Caruso, B. A. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220114 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Thapa, S., Bhattarai, S., & Aro, A. R. (2019) · SAGE Open Medicine · doi:10.1177/2050312119850400 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Hennegan, J. M., OlaOlorun, F. M., Oumarou, S., Alzouma, S., Guiella, G., Omoluabi, E., & Schwab, K. J. (2021) · Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters · doi:10.1080/26410397.2021.1915940 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationRatcliffe, H. L., Bell, G. A., Awoonor‐Williams, J. K., Bitton, A., Kim, J., Lipstiz, S. R., Macarayan, E. K., Ofosu, A. A., Otupiri, E., Schwarz, D., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000886 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Hennegan, J. M., Bukenya, J. N., Makumbi, F. E., Nakamya, P., Exum, N. G., Schwab, K. J., & Kibira, S. P. S. (2022) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000589 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationSmith, A. D., Muli, A., Schwab, K. J., & Hennegan, J. M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17082633 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving Menstrual Health Literacy Through Life-Skills Programming in Rural Ethiopia
Baird, S., Hicks, J. H., Gezahegne, K., Pincock, K., Woldehanna, T., Yadete, W., & Jones, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Global Women s Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2022.838961 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Female-friendly toilets in schools in Burkina Faso: A mixed-methods study using photo-elicitation
Buitrago-García, T., Sawadogo, N., Souares, A., Koulidiati, J., Sié, A., Bärnighausen, T., Langlotz, S., & McMahon, S. A. (2022) · Journal of Global Health · doi:10.7189/jogh.12.04057 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Chai, N., & Mao, C. (2021) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112482 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sommer, M., Zulaika, G., Schmitt, M. L., Khandakji, S., Neudorf, K., Gellis, L., & Phillips‐Howard, P. A. (2020) · Journal of Global Health Reports · doi:10.29392/001c.12105 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hennegan, J., Shannon, A. K., Schwab, K. J., & On behalf of PMA2020 investigators
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hennegan, Julie
- Venue
- Reproductive Health Matters
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 81-91
- ISSN
- 0968-8080 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9576
- PMC
- PMC7745112
- OpenAlex
- W2883038993
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reproductive Health Matters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (114805)
- Giving Wings and Futura Foundations
- The Osprey Foundation of Maryland
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Keywords
- menstrual hygiene management, menstrual practices, demographic differences, women's health, vulnerable populations, wealth, urban residence, unmarried young women
- MeSH terms
- Developing Countries, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Hygiene, Income, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Menstruation, Urban Population, Menstrual Hygiene Products
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review