Cited by 24Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesTendon Structure and Treatment

The effects of knee joint kinematics on anterior cruciate ligament injury and articular cartilage damage

Orsi, Alexander D., Chakravarthy, Srinath, Canavan, Paul K., Peña, Estefanía, Goebel, Ruben, Vaziri, Askhan, Nayeb-Hashemi, Hamid·2016·Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

This study determined which knee joint motions lead to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with the knee at 25° of flexion. The knee was subjected to internal and external rotations, as well as varus and valgus motions. A failure locus representing the relationship between these motions and ACL rupture was established using finite element simulations. This study also considered possible concomitant injuries to the tibial articular cartilage prior to ACL injury. The posterolateral bundle of the ACL demonstrated higher rupture susceptibility than the anteromedial bundle. The average varus angular displacement required for ACL failure was 46.6% lower compared to the average valgus angular displacement. Femoral external rotation decreased the frontal plane angle required for ACL failure by 27.5% compared to internal rotation. Tibial articular cartilage damage initiated prior to ACL failure in all valgus simulations. The results from this investigation agreed well with other experimental and analytical investigations. This study provides a greater understanding of the various knee joint motion combinations leading to ACL injury and articular cartilage damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10255842.2015.1043626

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orsi, A. D., Chakravarthy, S., Canavan, P. K., Peña, E., Goebel, R., Vaziri, A., & Nayeb-Hashemi, H.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
  • Qatar University (QA)
Venue
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
Published
2015-06-11
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
493-506
ISSN
  • 1025-5842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8259
OpenAlex
W2281653111
Cited by
24
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament injury, knee kinematics, articular cartilage damage, valgus loading, femoral external rotation, tibial internal rotation, posterolateral bundle, anteromedial bundle, failure locus, knee biomechanics
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cartilage, Articular, Femur, Humans, Knee Injuries, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Theoretical, Rotation, Rupture, Tibia, Reproducibility of Results, Range of Motion, Articular, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Soft Tissue Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review