Cited by 50Fatty Acid Research and HealthNutritional Studies and DietCardiac Health and Mental Health

Advice to eat fish and mood: a randomised controlled trial in men with angina

Ness, Andrew R., Gallacher, John E.J., Bennett, Paul D., Gunnell, David J., Rogers, Peter J., Kessler, David, Burr, Michael L.·2003·Nutritional Neuroscience

Abstract

People with high intake of fish have lower reported rates of depression and a small trial in psychiatric patients suggested that fish oil supplements reduced episodes of depression and mania. As part of a factorial trial of interventions to reduce mortality in angina 452 men were randomised to advice to eat more fatty fish or no fish advice. Maxepa fish oil capsules were supplied to men who found the fish unpalatable. Fish intake and mood were assessed at baseline and six months. Most men (83%) had mood assessed using the Derogatis Stress Profile at baseline and follow-up. Self reported intake of fish was higher in the fish advice group at six months. There was, however, no difference in depression or anxiety in those allocated to receive fish advice. After controlling for baseline mood, the difference in depression score between those randomised to fish advice and those not was 1.29 (95% CI -0.29 to 2.88) and the difference in anxiety was 0.82 (95% CI -0.57 to 2.22) with positive differences indicating more depression or anxiety in those allocated to the fish arm. This trial provides no evidence that increased fatty fish intake in people without depressive symptoms has any substantial effect on mood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1028415021000056069

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ness, A. R., Gallacher, J. E. J., Bennett, P. D., Gunnell, D. J., Rogers, P. J., Kessler, D., & Burr, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Wales (GB)
Venue
Nutritional Neuroscience
Published
2003-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
63-65
ISSN
  • 1028-415X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8305
OpenAlex
W2007041301
Cited by
50
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutritional Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
fish consumption, fatty fish, fish oil supplements, depression, anxiety, mood, angina pectoris, men, dietary recommendations, mortality reduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Angina Pectoris, Animals, Anxiety, Depression, Diet, Fish Oils, Fishes, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Seafood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review