Cited by 243Fatty Acid Research and HealthTryptophan and brain disordersNutritional Studies and Diet

No effect of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (EPA and DHA) supplementation on depressed mood and cognitive function: a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Rogers, Peter J., Appleton, Katherine M., Kessler, David, Peters, Tim J., Gunnell, David, Hayward, Robert C., Heatherley, Susan V., Christian, Leonie M. +2 more·2008·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Low dietary intakes of the n-3 long-chain PUFA (LCPUFA) EPA and DHA are thought to be associated with increased risk for a variety of adverse outcomes, including some psychiatric disorders. Evidence from observational and intervention studies for a role of n-3 LCPUFA in depression is mixed, with some support for a benefit of EPA and/or DHA in major depressive illness. The present study was a double-blind randomised controlled trial that evaluated the effects of EPA+DHA supplementation (1·5 g/d) on mood and cognitive function in mild to moderately depressed individuals. Of 218 participants who entered the trial, 190 completed the planned 12 weeks intervention. Compliance, confirmed by plasma fatty acid concentrations, was good, but there was no evidence of a difference between supplemented and placebo groups in the primary outcome – namely, the depression subscale of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales at 12 weeks. Mean depression score was 8·4 for the EPA+DHA group and 9·6 for the placebo group, with an adjusted difference of − 1·0 (95 % CI − 2·8, 0·8;P = 0·27). Other measures of mood, mental health and cognitive function, including Beck Depression Inventory score and attentional bias toward threat words, were similarly little affected by the intervention. In conclusion, substantially increasing EPA+DHA intake for 3 months was found not to have beneficial or harmful effects on mood in mild to moderate depression. Adding the present result to a meta-analysis of previous relevant randomised controlled trial results confirmed an overall negligible benefit of n-3 LCPUFA supplementation for depressed mood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114507801097

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An RCT evaluating the effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (1.5 g/day) supplementation on mood and cognition in mildly to moderately depressed patients did not indicate any significant change in cognitive functions.

    “An RCT evaluating the effect of n-3 PUFA (1.5 g/day) supplementation on mood and cognition in mildly to moderately depressed patients did not indicate any significant change in cognitive functions [139].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Murray CJL & Lopez AD (1996) The Global Burden of Disease. Cambridge MA: Harvard School of Public Health.
  2. Baddeley A (1986) Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, P. J., Appleton, K. M., Kessler, D., Peters, T. J., Gunnell, D., Hayward, R. C., Heatherley, S. V., Christian, L. M., McNaughton, S. A., & Ness, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory (GB)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Peter J.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2008-02
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
421-431
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2109322748
Cited by
243
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
20.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • Food Standards Agency
  • University of Southampton
  • University of Bristol
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, fatty acid supplementation, depression, depressive mood, cognitive function, mild to moderate depression, plasma fatty acid concentrations
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Cognition, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Patient Compliance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review