The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential Originality and Effectiveness: The Dynamic Definition of Creativity
Open accessAbstract
Given the central role of creativity in the future post-information society, a call for a pragmatist approach to the study of creativity is advocated, that brings as a consequence the recognition of the dynamic nature of this phenomenon. At the foundation of the proposed new theoretical framework lies the definition of creativity itself, which is turned from static to dynamic through the introduction of the concept of potential originality and effectiveness. Starting from this central definition, and through the introduction of the auxiliary definitions for focus area, creativity goal, creative agent, creative potential of an agent, creative potential of an environment, creative process, product of a creative process, creativity potential of a process, representation of the product of a creative process, and estimator, we arrive at the definitions of creative achievement and creative inconclusiveness. Although both aspects are key in the creative process, creative inconclusiveness was not part of previous definitions, but it is argued that its role is fundamental for effective education in creativity. The new definitions are shown to have full backward compatibility with the extant corpus of scientific research in creativity, as well as forward effectiveness in suggesting novel investigation approaches to support the consideration of new theoretical hypotheses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce
(1935) · Nature · doi:10.1038/135131a0 · Cited by 4,604
The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.184834 · Cited by 4,381
The associative basis of the creative process.
Mednick, S. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048850 · Cited by 4,140
The standard definition of creativity
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 · Cited by 3,895
Guilford, J. P. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0063487 · Cited by 3,588
Boden, M. A. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203508527 · Cited by 2,775
Lorenzen, M. (2009) · Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy · doi:10.4324/9780203880012-4a · Cited by 2,435
Wallas, G. (1926) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,973
Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences.
Galton, F. (1869) · Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1037/13474-000 · Cited by 1,940
Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking.
James, W. (1907) · doi:10.1037/10851-000 · Cited by 1,804
Cited by
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., et al. (2023) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence11030054 · Cited by 768
“Moreover, Corazza (2016) challenged this standard definition of creativity, arguing that as it focuses solely on the existence of an original and effective outcome, it misses the dynamics of the creative process, which is frequently associated with periods of creative inconclusiveness and limited…”
BackgroundA Dynamic Definition of Creativity
Walia, C. (2019) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2019.1641787 · Cited by 238
Artificial muses: Generative artificial intelligence chatbots have risen to human-level creativity
Haase, J., & Hanel, P. H. P. (2023) · Journal of Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100066 · Cited by 233
How Does Narrow AI Impact Human Creativity?
Marrone, R., Cropley, D., & Medeiros, K. (2026) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2024.2378264 · Cited by 65
Lloyd-Cox, J., Pickering, A., & Bhattacharya, J. (2022) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2022.2125721 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Corazza, G. E.
- Venue
- Creativity Research Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-07-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 258-267
- ISSN
- 1040-0419 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6934
- OpenAlex
- W2476024407
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 34.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential Originality and Effectiveness: The Dynamic Definition of Creativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
- The paper
- Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential Originality and Effectiveness: The Dynamic Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.