The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants
Abstract
This review surveys the occurrence, analysis, and properties of glucosinolates and derived compounds in plants and products intended for humans and animal consumption. The paper, which includes references published in 1981, is also intended to compliment existing reviews on the chemistry of these sulfur‐containing natural products. Particular emphasis is placed upon members of the Brassica family because of their importance as vegetables, condiments, oilseeds, and animal feedingstuffs. Since much of the work considered here relates to glucosinolate decomposition products, biochemical information concerning the nature, occurrence, and properties of the glucosinolate‐degrading enzyme, myrosinase, is considered in Section III. The methods available for the chemical analysis of glucosinolates and their various breakdown products are discussed critically. Factors affecting the glucosinolate content of plants and plant products arc outlined in Section VII. Particular emphasis is placed upon the effect of processing on the concentration and nature of breakdown products and on the myrosinase activity. The role of glucosinolate breakdown products on flavor development is examined in Section VIII. The more general effects, both beneficial and adverse, of these compounds in food are discussed in Section X. Since such effects in animal feedingstuffs have been the subject of regular reviews, these are considered here only briefly. Contraindications in the literature are pointed out, areas which have been inadequately explored are highlighted, and suggestions are made for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Volatile sulfur compounds in food flavors
Shankaranarayana, M. L., Raghavan, B., Abraham, K. O., Natarajan, C. P., & Brodnitz, H. H. (1974) · C R C Critical Reviews in Food Technology · doi:10.1080/10408397409527163 · Cited by 87
Cited by
Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology
Steinmetz, K. A., & Potter, J. D. (1991) · Cancer Causes and Control · doi:10.1007/bf00051672 · Cited by 1,118
Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. II. Mechanisms
Steinmetz, K. A., & Potter, J. D. (1991) · Cancer Causes and Control · doi:10.1007/bf00054304 · Cited by 804
Tripathi, P., & Dubey, N. K. (2004) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.11.005 · Cited by 786
Nutrients, foods, and colorectal cancer prevention
Song, M., Garrett, W. S., & Chan, A. T. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.035 · Cited by 700
Fungal Resistance to Plant Antibiotics as a Mechanism of Pathogenesis
Morrissey, J. P., & Osbourn, A. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.3.708-724.1999 · Cited by 635
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenwick, G. R., Heaney, R. K., Mullin, W. J., & VanEtten, C. H.
- Venue
- C R C Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-201
- ISSN
- 0099-0248 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041550216
- Cited by
- 1,320
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408398209527361
- The paper
- Fenwick, G. R., Heaney, R. K., Mullin, W. J., & VanEtten, C. H. (1983). Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants. C R C Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398209527361
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.