Cited by 804Nutritional Studies and DietPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. II. Mechanisms

Steinmetz, Kristi A., Potter, John D.·1991·Cancer Causes and Control

Abstract

The epidemiologic literature on the relationship between vegetable and fruit consumption and human cancer at a variety of sites was reviewed systematically in Part I. It was concluded that consumption of higher levels of vegetables and fruit is associated consistently, although not universally, with a reduced risk of cancer at most sites, and particularly with epithelial cancers of the alimentary and respiratory tracts. Possible mechanisms by which vegetable and fruit intake might alter risk of cancer are addressed here. A large number of potentially anticarcinogenic agents are found in these food sources, including carotenoids, vitamins C and E, selenium, dietary fiber, dithiolthiones, glucosinolates and indoles, isothiocyanates, flavonoids, phenols, protease inhibitors, plant sterols, allium compounds, and limonene. These agents have both complementary and overlapping mechanisms of action, including the induction of detoxification enzymes, inhibition of nitrosamine formation, provision of substrate for formation of antineoplastic agents, dilution and binding of carcinogens in the digestive tract, alteration of hormone metabolism, antioxidant effects, and others. It appears extremely unlikely that any one substance is responsible for all the associations seen. Possible adverse effects of vegetable and fruit consumption are also examined. One way to consider the relationships reviewed here is to hypothesize that humans are adapted to a high intake of plant foods that supply substances crucial to the maintenance of the organism, but only some of which are currently called 'essential nutrients.' Cancer may be the result of reducing the level of intake of foods that are metabolically necessary--it may be a disease of maladaptation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00054304

Cites

157 of 157 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinmetz, K. A., & Potter, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Cancer Causes and Control
Published
1991-11
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
427-442
ISSN
  • 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7225
OpenAlex
W1967401562
Cited by
804
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ca046618-03)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009607, P01CA050305, CA 46618, CA09607, CA50305)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
vegetable consumption, fruit consumption, cancer prevention, anticarcinogenic mechanisms, carotenoids, vitamins C and E, selenium, dietary fiber, glucosinolates, isothiocyanates, flavonoids, phenols, protease inhibitors, phytosterols, limonene, antioxidant activity, carcinogen binding, hormone metabolism, epithelial cancers
MeSH terms
Diet, Fruit, Humans, Neoplasms, Vegetables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review