Cited by 19Cancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Interactivity, Presence, and Targeted Patient Care: Mapping e-Health Intervention Effects Over Time for Cancer Patients with Depression

Open access
Kim, Sojung Claire, Shaw, Bret R., Shah, Dhavan V., Hawkins, Robert P., Pingree, Suzanne, McTavish, Fiona M., Gustafson, David H.·2019·Health Communication

Abstract

This study examined the interplay of depression and different types of e-health interventions on breast cancer patients' perceived healthcare competence, emotional processing, and social well-being over time. The three e-health interventions--Internet Only as a control condition, CHESS (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System) Only, and CHESS with a Human Mentor, a cancer information specialist--provided varying degrees of interactivity and presence. A total of 328 women with breast cancer participated in one of the three interventions for a 6-month period. Women were further split into two groups based on reported levels of depression. For perceived healthcare competence and social well-being, results revealed significant interaction effects for intervention type by depression over time, such that breast cancer patients with higher levels of depression benefited most from the CHESS with Mentor intervention over the 6-month study period. For emotional processing, depressed cancer patients benefited more from the CHESS with Mentor than the other two interventions, regardless of time. These findings have (a) theoretical implications on how mental health factors can intersect with interactivity and presence to influence psychosocial outcomes, (b) conceptual implications for the role of human interaction within e-health systems, and (c) practical implications for the development of e-health interventions for cancer patients with depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10410236.2017.1399504

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are promising studies regarding anxiety and depression using eHealth with different psychological interventions, but the results are heterogeneous.

    “There are promising studies regarding anxiety and depression using eHealth with different psychological interventions.9,14-17 However, the results are heterogeneous.14,15”

    From Effects of a Video Sequence Based Intervention on Anxiety, Fatigue and Depression in Cancer Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

    The “Depression among Cancer Patients” section describes evidence of positive psychosocial effects from e-health interventions, and the Discussion reports that the intervention types produced different outcomes for breast cancer patients. The cited paper does not establish promising results for anxiety or say that results across studies of different psychological interventions are heterogeneous. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S. C., Shaw, B. R., Shah, D. V., Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., McTavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Sojung Claire
Venue
Health Communication
Published
2017-11-14
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
162-171
ISSN
  • 1041-0236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7027
OpenAlex
W2770817309
Cited by
19
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50 CA095817-05)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
breast cancer, depression, digital health interventions, interactivity, presence, chess, emotional processing, social well-being, psychosocial outcomes
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Patient Care, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Social Support, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review