The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology
Abstract
In this chapter, we trace the historical and intellectual origins of system justification theory, summarise the basic assumptions of the theory, and derive 18 specific hypotheses from a system justification perspective. We review and integrate empirical evidence addressing these hypotheses concerning the rationalisation of the status quo, the internalisation of inequality (outgroup favouritism and depressed entitlement), relations among ego, group, and system justification motives (including consequences for attitudinal ambivalence, self-esteem, and psychological well-being), and the reduction of ideological dissonance. Turning to the question of why people would engage in system justification--especially when it conflicts with other interests and motives--we propose that system-justifying ideologies serve a palliative function in that they reduce anxiety, guilt, dissonance, discomfort, and uncertainty for those who are advantaged and disadvantaged.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“System justification serves a palliative function in that it reduces anxiety, discomfort, and uncertainty (Jost & Hunyady, 2003).”
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Selections from the prison notebooks
Gramsci, A. (2020) · The Applied Theatre Reader · doi:10.4324/9780429355363-27 · Cited by 9,750
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,207
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Bruνswik, E., Levinson, D. M., & Sandford, R. N. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446220986.n8 · Cited by 6,460
Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 · Cited by 4,872
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1986) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,544
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 831
Shuman, E., Saguy, T., van Zomeren, M., & Halperin, E. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000333 · Cited by 96
Can Evidence Impact Attitudes? Public Reactions to Evidence of Gender Bias in STEM Fields
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Molenda, A. K., & Cramer, C. R. (2015) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684314565777 · Cited by 98
Friesen, J. P., Laurin, K., Shepherd, S., Gaucher, D. M., & Kay, A. C. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12278 · Cited by 104
Bahamondes, J., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219829178 · Cited by 91
Derogating humor as a delegitimization strategy in intergroup contexts.
Hodson, G., & MacInnis, C. C. (2016) · Translational Issues in Psychological Science · doi:10.1037/tps0000052 · Cited by 90
Stability and the justification of social inequality
Laurin, K., Gaucher, D. M., & Kay, A. C. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1949 · Cited by 90
System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology.
Day, M. V., Kay, A. C., Holmes, J. G., & Napier, J. L. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023197 · Cited by 90
Owuamalam, C. K., Rubin, M., & Spears, R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12285 · Cited by 93
Police legitimacy, ideology and qualitative methods: A critique of procedural justice theory
Harkin, D. (2015) · Criminology & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/1748895815580397 · Cited by 89
The Relationship Between Right-Wing Ideological Attitudes and Psychological Well-Being
Onraet, E., Hiel, A. V., & Dhont, K. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213478199 · Cited by 97
Holtz, P., & Wagner, W. (2009) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.1005 · Cited by 87
Rankin, L. E., Jost, J., & Wakslak, C. J. (2009) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-009-0100-9 · Cited by 84
Self-citationSystem justification and the perception of food risks
Vainio, A., Mäkiniemi, J.-P., & Paloniemi, R. (2013) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430213503502 · Cited by 81
Louis, W. R., Esses, V. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12044 · Cited by 84
Ongoing Victim Suffering Increases Prejudice: The Case of Secondary Anti-Semitism
Imhoff, R., & Banse, R. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02457.x · Cited by 84
System justification: How do we know it’s motivated?
Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., van der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A. N., & Nosek, B. A. (2010) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.4324/9780203837658-12 · Cited by 83
Self-citationSocial creativity: Reviving a social identity approach to social stability
van Bezouw, M. J., van der Toorn, J., & Becker, J. C. (2020) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2732 · Cited by 82
Ståhl, T., Eek, D., & Kazemi, A. (2010) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0117-0 · Cited by 93
Can the absence of prejudice be more threatening than its presence? It depends on one's worldview.
Townsend, S. S. M., Major, B., Sawyer, P. J., & Mendes, W. B. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020434 · Cited by 80
The role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement
Federico, C. M., Williams, A. L., & Vitriol, J. A. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2495 · Cited by 85
Why are Benevolent Sexists Happier?
Hammond, M. D., & Sibley, C. G. (2011) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0017-2 · Cited by 81
Deaux, K., Reid, A., Martin, D., & Bikmen, N. (2006) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00452.x · Cited by 81
Working class conservatism: a system justification perspective
Jost, J. T. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.020 · Cited by 95
Self-citationJost, J. T., Wakslak, C. J., & Tyler, T. R. (2008) · Advances in group processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(08)25012-5 · Cited by 85
Self-citationvan der Toorn, J., & Jost, J. T. (2014) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430214531509 · Cited by 80
Self-citationChange agents or defending the status quo? How senior leaders frame workplace gender equality
Cortis, N., Foley, M., & Williamson, S. (2021) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12742 · Cited by 82
Is there an epistemic advantage to being oppressed?
Dror, L. (2023) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12424 · Cited by 78
Correia, I. F., Batista, M. T., & Lima, M. L. (2009) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530802579515 · Cited by 78
Zimmerman, J. L., & Reyna, C. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032967 · Cited by 82
It's fair for us: Diversity structures cause women to legitimize discrimination
Brady, L., Kaiser, C. R., Major, B., & Kirby, T. A. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.11.010 · Cited by 89
Chapleau, K. M., & Oswald, D. L. (2013) · Journal of Trauma & Dissociation · doi:10.1080/15299732.2014.867573 · Cited by 77
“Making America great again”: System justification in the U.S. presidential election of 2016.
Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., & Rothmund, T. (2017) · Translational Issues in Psychological Science · doi:10.1037/tps0000122 · Cited by 77
Self-citationSilván-Ferrero, M. D. P., & Bustillos, A. (2007) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1174/021347407779697485 · Cited by 95
Group identification moderates attitudes toward ingroup members who confront discrimination
Kaiser, C. R., Hagiwara, N., Malahy, L. W., & Wilkins, C. L. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.027 · Cited by 76
Hiel, A. V., & Clercq, B. J. D. (2009) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.702 · Cited by 75
Kende, A., Lantos, N. A., Belinszky, A., Csaba, S., & Lukács, Z. A. (2017) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v5i1.642 · Cited by 74
The subjective well-being political paradox: Happy welfare states and unhappy liberals.
Okulicz‐Kozaryn, A., Holmes, O., & Avery, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037654 · Cited by 79
The future of system justification theory
Jost, J. T., Badaan, V., Goudarzi, S., Hoffarth, M. R., & Mogami, M. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12309 · Cited by 85
Self-citationHow do We Know When We are Treated Fairly? Justice Rules and Fairness Judgments
Cropanzano, R., Fortin, M., & Kirk, J. F. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-730120150000033010 · Cited by 83
Johnson, I. R., & Fujita, K. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611423670 · Cited by 71
BY CHOICE OR BY CIRCUMSTANCE?: STEREOTYPES OF AND FEELINGS ABOUT SINGLE PEOPLE
Slonim, G., Gur‐Yaish, N., & Katz, R. (2015) · Studia Psychologica · doi:10.21909/sp.2015.01.672 · Cited by 70
Perpetuating One’s Own Disadvantage
Sengupta, N. K., & Sibley, C. G. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213497593 · Cited by 71
Vainio, A., & Paloniemi, R. (2014) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.026 · Cited by 80
Stereotypes as Justifications of Prejudice
Crandall, C. S., Bahns, A. J., Warner, R. H., & Schaller, M. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211411723 · Cited by 70
CHAPTER 7 A Contextual Analysis of the System Justification Motive and Its Societal Consequences
Kay, A. C., & Zanna, M. P. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.007 · Cited by 70
Osborne, D., Sengupta, N. K., & Sibley, C. G. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12302 · Cited by 70
Harding, J. F., & Sibley, C. G. (2012) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0101-1 · Cited by 68
Sengupta, N. K., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2014) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12080 · Cited by 74
Higher Inequality Increases the Gap in the Perceived Merit of the Rich and Poor
Heiserman, N., & Simpson, B. (2017) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272517711919 · Cited by 66
Goldsmith, R. E., Martin, C. G., & Smith, C. P. (2014) · Journal of Trauma & Dissociation · doi:10.1080/15299732.2014.871666 · Cited by 71
L'emprise de la méritocratie scolaire : quelle légitimité ?
Duru‐Bellat, M., & Tenret, É. (2009) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.3917/rfs.502.0229 · Cited by 66
Hawley, P. H., Short, S. D., McCune, L. A., Osman, M. R., & Little, T. D. (2010) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1007/s12052-010-0294-1 · Cited by 66
Political conservatism, religion, and environmental consumption in the United States
Peifer, J. L., Khalsa, S., & Ecklund, E. H. (2016) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1159604 · Cited by 66
Alizadeh, M., Weber, I. G., Cioffi‐Revilla, C. A., Fortunato, S., & Macy, M. W. (2019) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0193-9 · Cited by 72
Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations
Madeira, F., Costa‐Lopes, R., Dovidio, J. F., Freitas, G. S., & Mascarenhas, M. F. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007 · Cited by 65
Lavi, I., Canetti, D., Sharvit, K., Bar‐Tal, D., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2012) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002712459711 · Cited by 62
The Negative Social World: The Polish Culture of Complaining
Wojciszke, B. (2004) · International Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1080/00207659.2004.11043140 · Cited by 62
Perceived system longevity increases system justification and the legitimacy of inequality
Blanchar, J. C., & Eidelman, S. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1960 · Cited by 61
Verniers, C., Bonnot, V., & Assilaméhou‐Kunz, Y. (2022) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103614 · Cited by 61
Preferences for redistribution
Mengel, F., & Weidenholzer, E. (2022) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12519 · Cited by 67
Opiate of the Masses? Inequality, Religion, and Political Ideology in the United States
Schnabel, L. (2020) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soaa027 · Cited by 62
Cichocka, A. K., Górska, P., Jost, J. T., Sutton, R. M., & Bilewicz, M. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000168 · Cited by 60
Self-citationSubjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries
Brandt, M. J., Kuppens, T., Spears, R., Andrighetto, L., Autin, F., Babinčák, P., Badea, C., Bae, J., Batruch, A., Becker, J. C., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2694 · Cited by 64
Narcissism Predicts Support for Hierarchy (At Least When Narcissists Think They Can Rise to the Top)
Zitek, E. M., & Jordan, A. H. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616649241 · Cited by 67
Ozmen, C. B., Brelsford, G. M., & Danieu, C. R. (2017) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-017-0477-y · Cited by 61
Bahamondes, J. (2016) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1223351 · Cited by 65
The implications of ideology on teachers’ beliefs regarding civic education
Knowles, R. T., & Castro, A. (2018) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.009 · Cited by 77
The Gender Gap in Environmental Attitudes: A System Justification Perspective
Goldsmith, R. E., Feygina, I., & Jost, J. T. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5518-5_12 · Cited by 58
Self-citationSanctioning Resistance to Sexual Objectification: An Integrative System Justification Perspective
Calogero, R. M., & Tylka, T. L. (2014) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12090 · Cited by 59
Dardenne, B., Delacollette, N., Grégoire, C., & Lecocq, D. (2006) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.4074/s0003503306002041 · Cited by 58
Wiley, S., Deaux, K., & Hagelskamp, C. (2012) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027661 · Cited by 56
Legitimacy of Inequality in a Highly Unequal Context: Evidence from the Chilean Case
Castillo, J. C. (2011) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-011-0144-5 · Cited by 68
Proudfoot, D., & Kay, A. C. (2014) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.03.001 · Cited by 65
Feygina, I. (2013) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0189-8 · Cited by 55
Status, Threat, and Stereotypes: Understanding the Function of Rape Myth Acceptance
Chapleau, K. M., & Oswald, D. L. (2013) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0177-z · Cited by 53
Gender Differences in Entitlement: The Role of System-Justifying Beliefs
O’Brien, L. T., Major, B. N., & Gilbert, P. N. (2012) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2012.655630 · Cited by 62
Undergraduates’ awareness of White and male privilege in STEM
Dancy, M., Rainey, K. D., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., & Möller, S. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00250-3 · Cited by 74
Rage Against the Machine: The Case for System‐Level Emotions
Solak, N., Jost, J. T., Sümer, N., & Clore, G. L. (2012) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00456.x · Cited by 55
Self-citationUnderstanding White Americans' Perceptions of Racism in Hurricane Katrina-Related Events
O’Brien, L. T., Blodorn, A., Alsbrooks, A., Dube, R., Adams, G., & Nelson, J. C. (2009) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209105047 · Cited by 54
Backlash against the #MeToo movement: How women’s voice causes men to feel victimized
Lisnek, J. A., Wilkins, C. L., Wilson, M. E., & Ekstrom, P. D. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211035437 · Cited by 52
Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., & Bauer, P. (2011) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.288 · Cited by 52
Self-citationWill Working Mothers’ Brains Explode? The Popular New Genre of Neurosexism
Fine, C. (2008) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-007-9004-2 · Cited by 52
Love and Resistance: Moral Solidarity in the Face of Perceptual Failure
Emerick, B. (2016) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2016.2.1 · Cited by 51
Vargas, J. H., Saetermoe, C. L., & Chavira, G. (2020) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00598-z · Cited by 63
Owuamalam, C. K., Rubin, M., & Issmer, C. (2016) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2016.1188442 · Cited by 51
Laurin, K. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617738814 · Cited by 57
System Justification Enhances Life Satisfaction of High- and Low-Status People in China
Li, W., Wu, J., & Kou, Y. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619866182 · Cited by 50
Overbeck, J. R., Jost, J. T., Mosso, C. O., & Flizik, A. (2004) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430204039972 · Cited by 51
Self-citationSelf‐Uncertainty, Social Identity, and the Solace of Extremism
Hogg, M. A. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444344073.ch2 · Cited by 52
Status legitimizing beliefs predict positivity toward Whites who claim anti-White bias
Wilkins, C. L., Wellman, J. D., & Kaiser, C. R. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.017 · Cited by 50
Liviatan, I., & Jost, J. T. (2011) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.231 · Cited by 50
Self-citationBlame It on Hip-Hop: Anti-Rap Attitudes as a Proxy for Prejudice
Reyna, C., Brandt, M. J., & Viki, G. T. (2009) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209102848 · Cited by 50
Jin, S. V., & Ryu, E. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12381 · Cited by 52
Planet of the Durkheimians, Where Community, Authority, and Sacredness are Foundations of MoralityPreprint
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.980844 · Cited by 52
Violence in Prolonged Conflicts and Its Socio-psychological Effects
Lavi, I., & Bar‐Tal, D. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8999-8_1 · Cited by 49
Rubin, M., Owuamalam, C. K., Spears, R., & Caricati, L. (2023) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2022.2046422 · Cited by 48
Kus, L., Liu, J. H.-F., & Ward, C. A. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1958 · Cited by 51
Chow, R. M., Lowery, B. S., & Knowles, E. D. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.002 · Cited by 48
Zhu, R., Srivastava, A., & Sutanto, J. (2020) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-03-2019-0117 · Cited by 47
O’Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.017 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Jost, J., & Hunyady, O.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Debrecen (HU)
- ORCID
- Jost, John
- Venue
- European Review of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-153
- ISSN
- 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-277X
- OpenAlex
- W1969329871
- Cited by
- 833
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 56.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- system justification theory, ideology, attitudinal ambivalence, self-esteem, psychological well-being, anxiety reduction, guilt reduction, uncertainty reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review