Cited by 21Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsInnovative Education and Learning PracticesOnline and Blended Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social and cognitive dimensions of collaboration in informal learning spaces: Malaysian social science students’ perspectives

Chang-Tik, Chan, Goh, Joseph N.·2023·Interactive Learning Environments

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to attain a better understanding of Collaborative Learning in Informal Spaces (CLIS) by addressing the nature of learning activities that will trigger socio-cognitive conflicts and the kind of socio-emotional challenges experienced in CLIS. To this end, research was conducted over four weeks where tasks were divided into pre-CLIS, during CLIS session and during CLIS presentation. The data in the form of video-stimulated semi-structured interviews were collected from 20 Year Two Gender Studies students of Monash University Malaysia. Based on the data collected, the students were divided into the Effective Learning Group (ELG) and the Lees Effective Learning Group (LELG). Consequently, the interview data were transcribed and analysed using the framework method as a form of thematic analysis. The results reveal that the LELG students require additional assistance from the lecturers and peers to overcome the pre-CLIS learning activities challenges. Further, ELG students are better at coordinating team members’ understandings leading to mutually shared cognition. Worthy of note is that the LELG students need to accept the fact that in collaborative learning, a socio-emotional atmosphere is strongly present and they have to learn to regulate the conflict rather than avoiding it.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2020.1799029

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1080/10494820.2020.1728342 · DOI
  2. 10.3166/ria.16.587-620 · DOI
  3. 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bereiter C., 2002, Education and mind in the modern age
  5. 10.4324/9781315617572-34 · DOI
  6. Boekaerts M., 2011, Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 408
  7. 10.1207/s15430421tip4301_4 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.506 · DOI
  9. Dillenbourg P., 2002, Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL, 61
  10. 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.009 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.004 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/1464-0597.00142 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.09.001 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.025 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.005 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s11251-006-9008-z · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.028 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.004 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/17439880500093612 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/00221546.2018.1442638 · DOI
  25. 10.11613/BM.2012.031 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/1469787417731176 · DOI
  29. Op’t Eynde P., 2007, Emotions in education, 185
  30. 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Pea R. D., 1993, Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations, 47
  32. 10.1111/bjso.12015 · DOI
  33. Stahl, G. A. (2000, June). A model of collaborative knowledge building [Paper presentation]. 4th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
  34. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/1046496406292938 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/s11251-010-9128-3 · DOI
  38. 10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.237 · DOI
  39. Van Merrienboer J. J. G., 1997, Training complex cognitive skills
  40. Whiteside A., 2010, Educause Quarterly, 33, 11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Chang-Tik, C., & Goh, J. N.
Affiliations
Monash University Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Chang-Tik, Chan
Venue
Interactive Learning Environments
Published
2020-08-03
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
609-623
ISSN
  • 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5191
OpenAlex
W3046826673
Cited by
21
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
Funders
Monash University Malaysia Learning and Teaching Research Grant (E/EE/LTG_11/2018/01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
socio-cognitive conflict, social-emotional problems, shared cognition, peer learning, conflict regulation, social sciences students, gender studies education, student perceptions, Malaysian higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review