CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 336Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: what questions should we ask of ChatGPT?

Open access
Rospigliosi, Pericles ‘asher’·2023·Interactive Learning Environments
DOI 10.1080/10494820.2023.2180191
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The recent release of ChatGPT, a flexible and accessible form of artificial intelligence, raises a multitude of questions for those of us interested in interactive learning environments. The purpose of ChatGPT is to invite questions, but many of the questions being asked in relation to teaching and learning tend to focus on the potential risks of students misusing ChatGPT, for example, by using it to write essays. It is important for the journal to examine and question the questions we ask about the use of technologies in learning environments. This editorial will explore some of the questions being asked of ChatGPT and identify areas of inquiry that may provide value to those thinking about the relationship between artificial intelligence and learning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2023.2180191

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 336

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rospigliosi, P. ‘.
Affiliations
University of Brighton
Venue
Interactive Learning Environments
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2023-01-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
1-3
ISSN
  • 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5191
DOI
10.1080/10494820.2023.2180191
OpenAlex
W4321504196
Cited by
335
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 58
FWCI
78.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
ChatGPT, artificial intelligence in education, generative AI, AI in teaching and learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review