Cited by 155Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

“It is never okay to talk about suicide”: Patients’ reasons for concealing suicidal ideation in psychotherapy

Blanchard, Matt, Farber, Barry A.·2020·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

Objective: To identify psychotherapy clients’ motives for concealing suicidal ideation from their therapist, and their perceptions of how their therapists could better elicit honest disclosure. Method: A sample of 66 psychotherapy clients who reported concealing suicidal ideation from their therapist provided short essay responses explaining their motives for doing so and what their therapist could do to help them be more honest. Content analysis was used to identify major motives and themes in these responses. Results: Seventy percent of suicidal ideation concealers cited fear of unwanted practical impacts outside therapy as the reason they did not disclose. Chief among these unwanted impacts was involuntary hospitalization, a perceived outcome of disclosing even mild suicidal thoughts. Less concrete motives for concealment, such as shame or embarrassment, were significant but secondary concerns. Nearly half of suicide-concealing clients said they would be more honest only if the threat of hospitalization was somehow reduced or controlled. Conclusion: Fostering disclosure of suicidal ideation in therapy may require renewed attention to providing transparent, comprehensive, and easy-to-understand psychoeducation about the triggers for hospitalization and other interventions. Clients make risk-benefit calculations about whether to disclose suicidal ideation, but may operate with exaggerated or inaccurate ideas about the consequences of disclosure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2018.1543977

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blanchard, M., & Farber, B. A.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Blanchard, Matt
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2018-11-08
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
124-136
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W2900274605
Cited by
155
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
suicidal ideation, concealment, disclosure, psychotherapy patients, involuntary admission, fear of consequences, shame, psychoeducation, patient-therapist communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Deception, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Self Disclosure, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review