Cited by 31Innovative Education and Learning PracticesAdult and Continuing Education TopicsEducational and Psychological Assessments

Defensive and Expansive Cycles of Learning: A Study of Home Care Encounters

Open access
Nummijoki, Jaana, Engeström, Yrjö, Sannino, Annalisa·2018·Journal of the Learning Sciences

Abstract

This study examines learning in home care visits aimed at systematic facilitation of clients’ physical mobility. Building on the theory of expansive learning, we ask what kinds of learning cycles may be identified in home care encounters charged with implementing the new Mobility Agreement practice, what kinds of interplay may be detected between the parallel learning cycles of the home care client and the home care worker, and what the characteristics of defensive learning are. The data consist of 30 videotaped home care visits. The learning cycles of the encounters were found to be either predominantly defensive or expansive, which led to the identification of 4 basic types of combined learning cycles. Encounters in which the client’s and the worker’s cycles were aligned tended to contain fewer learning actions than encounters in which the cycles moved to opposite directions. The latter types of encounters were characterized by subtle orientational mismatches that left matters open and invoked further elaboration by the client and the worker. Defensive cycles were more reflective than expected and seemed to involve aspects of agency that are not commonly acknowledged.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10508406.2017.1412970

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The smallest scale of mini-cycles of expansive learning consists of single intervention sessions or similar restricted episodes.

    “The smallest scale of mini-cycles of expansive learning consist of single intervention sessions or similar restricted episodes (e.g., Nummijoki et al. 2018).”

    From Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning (2021) · cites this paper as Nummijoki et al. 2018

  • If expansive learning is successful, participants will move through the seven learning actions in the learning cycle and qualitative transformation will occur in all aspects of the activity system.

    “If this process is successful, the participants will move through the seven learning actions in the learning cycle (Table 2) and qualitative transformation will occur in all aspects of the activity system (Engeström, 2007, Engeström et al., 2013, Nummijoki et al., 2018).”
  • Several studies of expansive learning have required a prolonged study period of several years.

    “Several studies of expansive learning have required a prolonged study period of several years (Engeström et al., 2007;Nummijoki et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action approach. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  2. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2007). Creative controversy: Intellectual conflict in the classroom (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
  3. Nummijoki, J., & Engeström, Y. (2010). Towards co-configuration in home care of the elderly: Cultivating agency by designing and implementing the Mobility Agreement. In H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engeström, T. Gallagher, & S. R. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Activity theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies. London: Routledge (pp. 49-71).
  4. Pressman, J. L. & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation. 3rd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nummijoki, J., Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Tampere (FI)
Corresponding author
Nummijoki, Jaana
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Published
2018-01-10
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
224-264
ISSN
  • 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7809
OpenAlex
W2774026692
Cited by
31
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • the Academy of Finland (No. 253804)
  • Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation Tekes (No. 2992/31/2009)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
expansive learning, learning cycle, home care, physical mobility, customer-employee interaction, reflective practice, agency, home care workers, client learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review