Cited by 36Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesLegal and Social Justice Studies

Knowledge, attitude and practice of child sexual abuse prevention among parents of children with hearing loss: A pilot study in Beijing and Hebei Province, China

Guo, Suying, Chen, Jingqi, Yu, Buyi, Jiang, Yingying, Song, Yi, Jin, Yichen·2019·Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of child sexual abuse (CSA) prevention among parents of children with hearing loss. The study involved 127 pairs of parents with deaf and hard of hearing children from three special education schools in Beijing and Hebei province, China. The findings revealed that the parents lacked knowledge about CSA prevention, such as the character of perpetrators and child victims. Parents were supportive about potential CSA prevention education in schools. Most parents told children much about personal safety, but topics on CSA prevention were still insufficient. The study also found that education level was significantly associated with knowledge and attitude. Elder parents knew more and talked more about CSA prevention. Mothers and girls' parents were more willing to communicate with children about CSA prevention. The conclusion of the study was that parents appeared to have gained a positive attitude, but poor knowledge and practice. Their knowledge and skills of effective communication should be strengthened to promote CSA prevention practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10538712.2019.1627688

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents of children and adolescents with disabilities in one study testified that they lacked the knowledge of how to talk to their children and adolescents about OCSEA prevention, and more than 40% of parents who participated in the study thought their children and adolescents were too young to discuss this issue with.

    “Furthermore, parents of children and adolescents with disabilities in one study testified that they lacked the knowledge of how to talk to their children and adolescents about OCSEA prevention, and more than 40% of parents who participated in the study thought their children and adolescents were too young to discuss this issue with [30].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, S., Chen, J., Yu, B., Jiang, Y., Song, Y., & Jin, Y.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Jingqi
Venue
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
Published
2019-07-09
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
781-798
ISSN
  • 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0679
OpenAlex
W2959164861
Cited by
36
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse prevention, parents of deaf children, hearing loss, parental knowledge, attitudes and practices, special schools, educational attainment, Beijing, Hebei Province
MeSH terms
Beijing, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, China, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Pilot Projects, Persons with Hearing Disabilities, Persons With Hearing Impairments, Children with Disabilities, Disabled Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review