Cited by 53Digital Marketing and Social MediaSocial Media in Health EducationMedia and Digital Communication

How event information is trusted and shared on social media: a uses and gratification perspective

Kim, Sung-Eun, Kim, Hyelin Lina, Lee, Samuel·2021·Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing

Abstract

This study explored the gratification factors of event-focused social media content that affect information sharing and information trust and ultimately the intention to attend an event. It also investigated how non-content factors moderate these relationships. The findings showed that the gratification factors (i.e., informational, entertaining, remunerative, and relational) of social media content significantly influence event attendees’ intention to share information, perceived information trust, and thus their intention to attend the event. Non-contents (i.e., visual design and information overload) act as a critical moderator altering the effects of the gratification factors on attendees’ intention to share and information trust.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10548408.2021.1943600

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visually- and emotionally-appealing stimuli better satisfy users' media needs, leading to more trust, according to gratification theory.

    “According to the authors, this increase in trust can be attributed to gratifcation theory, as visually-and emotionally-appealing stimuli better satisfy users' media needs, leading to more trust [56].”
  • Multi-media and visual components invoke positive emotional sentiments among users, which contributes to increased trust in that information.

    “This is because these components often invoke positive emotional sentiments among users, which contributes to increased trust in that information [13,40,56].”
  • Trust in information on social media and trust in the platforms themselves positively influence people's intention to share information, news, and opinions on social media.

    “All the studies in our corpus suggest that trust in the information on social media [10,56,65,68] and trust in the platforms themselves [30,59,66,70] positively infuence people's intention to share information, news, and opinions on social media [122].”
  • High levels of perceived trust in event information on social media increase users' willingness to participate in that event offline.

    “For example, high levels of perceived trust in event information on social media increases users' willingness to participate in that event ofine [56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S.-E., Kim, H. L., & Lee, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Hyelin Lina
Venue
Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing
Published
2021-06-13
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
444-460
ISSN
  • 1054-8408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7306
OpenAlex
W3174847287
Cited by
53
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing (publishedVersion)
Funders
wttm
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
event information, social media, uses and gratifications theory, information sharing, trust in information, visual design, information overload, event marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review