Cited by 30Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Addiction Severity Index in Pathological Gamblers

Petry, Nancy M.·2007·The American Journal on Addictions

Abstract

This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) in 231 pathological gamblers. Internal consistency was similar to that reported in substance abusers, temporal stability was good, and convergent and discriminant validity was established with other indices of patient, collateral, and interviewer-rated reports. Predictive validity of most subscales was excellent when baseline composite scores were used to predict the utilization of relevant services or unemployment, probation/parole status, and bankruptcy one year later. Thus, the ASI may be a useful tool for assessing gambling and psychosocial problems in the growing population of treatment-seeking gamblers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10550490701389849

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Addiction Severity Index has demonstrated reliability and validity, including in pathological gamblers.

    “The ASI has demonstrated reliability and validity (Kosten, Rounsaville & Kleber, 1983; McLellan et al., 1985), including in PGs (Petry, 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petry, N. M.
Affiliations
UConn Health (US)
Corresponding author
Petry, Nancy M.
Venue
The American Journal on Addictions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
272-282
ISSN
  • 1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0391
OpenAlex
W2165853071
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal on Addictions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50aa003510-27)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P50- AA03510)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060417, R01-MH60417-SUPP)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA014618, R01DA018883, P50DA009241, R01DA016855, R01DA013444)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR006192)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Addiction Severity Index, gambling addiction, psychometric properties, concurrent validity, predictive validity, internal consistency, temporal stability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, service utilization, unemployment, bankruptcy, treatment-seeking gamblers, psychosocial problems
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gambling, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychology, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review