Cited by 33Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Falcão, Dircilene M., Sales, Luciane, Leite, José R., Feldman, Daniel, Valim, Valéria, Natour, Jamil·2008·Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT] in the fibromyalgia syndrome [FMS].Method: Sixty females, aged 18 to 65 years, with FMS, without previous treatment were randomized in CBT intervention group [10 structured group sessions once a week] or control group [routine weekly medical visits], for 10 weeks. The following instruments were used: visual analog scale, Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short form Health Survey [SF-36], subcomponent state of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, and the average number of paracetamol tablets. Additionally, patients were asked if they had improved “much,” “moderately,” “a little,” “nothing,” or felt “worse” on a Likert scale.Results: Patients in the CBT group presented significantly lower depression index and higher mental health score studied by the SF-36. Mean weekly intake of paracetamol tablets for pain controlwas significantly lower in CBT patients. In both groups, we observed statistically significant improvement in all the parameters over time.Conclusions: Patients under CBT needed significantly less analgesic tablets, and they achieved better responses in respect to depression and mental health than the controls. This result is expected since CBT is a psychological intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10582450802161796

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falcão, D. M., Sales, L., Leite, J. R., Feldman, D., Valim, V., & Natour, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
Corresponding author
Natour, Jamil
Venue
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Published
2008-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
133-140
ISSN
  • 1058-2452 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7012
OpenAlex
W2018142062
Cited by
33
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain (publishedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, fibromyalgia, depression, mental health, analgesic use, paracetamol, pain, anxiety, psychological intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review