Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,575

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation

Open access
Dahlgren, Peter·2005·Political Communication

Abstract

The theme of the Internet and the public sphere now has a permanent place on research agendas and in intellectual inquiry; it is entering the mainstream of political communication studies. The first part of this presentation briefly pulls together key elements in the public sphere perspective, underscoring three main analytic dimensions: the structural, the representational, and the interactional. Then the discussion addresses some central themes in the current difficulties facing democracy, refracted through the lens of the public sphere perspective. In particular, the destabilization of political communication systems is seen as a context for understanding the role of the Internet: It enters into, as well as contributes to, this destabilization. At the same time, the notion of destabilization can also embody a positive sense, pointing to dispersions of older patterns that may have outlived their utility. Further, the discussion takes up obvious positive consequences that follow from the Internet, for example that it extends and pluralizes the public sphere in a number of ways. Thereafter the focus moves on to the interactional dimension of the public sphere, specifically in regard to recent research on how deliberation proceeds in the online public sphere in the contemporary environment of political communication. Finally, the analytic category of deliberative democracy is critically examined; while useful, some of its rationalist biases, particularly in the context of extra–parliamentarian politics, limit its utility. It is suggested that the concept of civic cultures offers an alternative way to understand the significance of online political discussion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10584600590933160

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Alasuutari P., 1999, Rethinking the media audience, 10.4135/9781446216996 · doi:10.4135/9781446216996
  2. Anderson D. M., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values
  3. Asen R., 2001, Counterpublics and the state
  4. Baker C. E., 2002, Media, markets, and democracy
  5. Beck U., 1997, The reinvention of politics
  6. Benhabib S., 1996, Democracy and difference, 10.1515/9780691234168 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bennett W. L., 2003, Contesting media power, pp. 17
  8. Bennett W. L., 2003, Media and political style: Essays on representation and civic culture, pp. 137
  9. Bennett W. L., 2001, Mediated politics in the future of democracy
  10. Berman J., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values, pp. 77
  11. Blumler J. G., 2000, Mass media and society, pp. 155
  12. Blumler J. G., 2001, . Information, Communication & Society, 4, 1, 10.1080/713768514 · doi:10.1080/713768514
  13. Bohman J., 1996, Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy
  14. Cammaerts B., 2003, ICT-usage among transnational social movements in the networked society: To organize, to mediate, to influence
  15. Chambers S., 2000, Deliberation, democracy and the media
  16. Clift J., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values, pp. 157
  17. 10.1080/10584600050178933 · DOI
  18. Dahlgren P., 2000, Mass media and society, pp. 310
  19. Dahlgren P., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 5, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008804 · doi:10.1080/13183222.2002.11008804
  20. Dahlgren P., 2003, Media and political style: Essays on representation and civic culture, pp. 151
  21. Dewey J., 1954, The public and its problems
  22. Dryzek J., 1990, Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and political science, 10.1017/9781139173810 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Elster J., 1998, Deliberative democracy, 10.1017/CBO9781139175005 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Fenton N., 2003, Javnost/The Public, 10, 15, 10.1080/13183222.2003.11008819 · DOI
  25. Fishkin J., 1991, Democracy and deliberation
  26. Fraser N., 1992, Habermas and the public sphere, pp. 109
  27. Fung A., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 77, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008801 · doi:10.1080/13183222.2002.11008801
  28. Galston W. A., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values, pp. 35
  29. Giddens A., 1991, The consequences of modernity
  30. Graber D., 2003, The academy and Internet
  31. Habermas J., 1984, Theory of communicative action, 2
  32. Hagemann C., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 61, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008800 · doi:10.1080/13183222.2002.11008800
  33. Heikkilä H., 2003, Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 28, 157, 10.1515/comm.2003.011 · doi:10.1515/comm.2003.011
  34. Jenkins H., 2003, Democracy and new media, 10.7551/mitpress/2328.001.0001 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2328.001.0001
  35. Kalathil S., 2003, Open networks, closed regimes
  36. 10.1017/CBO9780511615023 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1111/1467-8675.00197 · DOI
  38. Lessig L., 1999, Code and other laws of cyberspace
  39. Lessig L., 2001, The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world
  40. Levine P., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values, pp. 47
  41. Lewis J., 2001, Constructing public opinion
  42. Malina A., 2003, Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 28, 135, 10.1515/comm.2003.010 · DOI
  43. Margolis M., 2000, Politics as usual: The cyberspace “revolution”, 10.4135/9781452233475 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Mouffe C., 1999, Social Research, 66, 745
  45. Negt O., 1993, The public sphere and experience
  46. Patekis K., 2000, Media organizations in society, pp. 84
  47. 10.1177/0090591797025003002 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Schiller D., 1999, Digital capitalism: Networking the global marketing system, 10.7551/mitpress/2415.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1177/016344300022002005 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Sparks C., 2001, Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy, pp. 75
  51. Splichal S., 1999, Public opinion: Developments and controversies in the twentieth century
  52. Stromer-Galley J., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 23, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008798 · DOI
  53. Tsaliki L., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 95, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008802 · DOI
  54. Wilhelm A. G., 2000, Democracy in the digital age

Cited by

See all 1,575

Metadata

Authors
Dahlgren, P.
Venue
Political Communication
Published
2005-04
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
147-162
ISSN
  • 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7675
OpenAlex
W1973033164
Cited by
1,575
References
2
FWCI
72.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.