The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation
Open accessAbstract
The theme of the Internet and the public sphere now has a permanent place on research agendas and in intellectual inquiry; it is entering the mainstream of political communication studies. The first part of this presentation briefly pulls together key elements in the public sphere perspective, underscoring three main analytic dimensions: the structural, the representational, and the interactional. Then the discussion addresses some central themes in the current difficulties facing democracy, refracted through the lens of the public sphere perspective. In particular, the destabilization of political communication systems is seen as a context for understanding the role of the Internet: It enters into, as well as contributes to, this destabilization. At the same time, the notion of destabilization can also embody a positive sense, pointing to dispersions of older patterns that may have outlived their utility. Further, the discussion takes up obvious positive consequences that follow from the Internet, for example that it extends and pluralizes the public sphere in a number of ways. Thereafter the focus moves on to the interactional dimension of the public sphere, specifically in regard to recent research on how deliberation proceeds in the online public sphere in the contemporary environment of political communication. Finally, the analytic category of deliberative democracy is critically examined; while useful, some of its rationalist biases, particularly in the context of extra–parliamentarian politics, limit its utility. It is suggested that the concept of civic cultures offers an alternative way to understand the significance of online political discussion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere
(2006) · Habermas · doi:10.4324/9780203020166-5 · Cited by 4,779
Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule
Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. C. (2010) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt6wpj9n · Cited by 96
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- Alasuutari P., 1999, Rethinking the media audience, 10.4135/9781446216996 · doi:10.4135/9781446216996
- Anderson D. M., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values
- Asen R., 2001, Counterpublics and the state
- Baker C. E., 2002, Media, markets, and democracy
- Beck U., 1997, The reinvention of politics
- Benhabib S., 1996, Democracy and difference, 10.1515/9780691234168 · DOI · Paper page
- Bennett W. L., 2003, Contesting media power, pp. 17
- Bennett W. L., 2003, Media and political style: Essays on representation and civic culture, pp. 137
- Bennett W. L., 2001, Mediated politics in the future of democracy
- Berman J., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values, pp. 77
- Blumler J. G., 2000, Mass media and society, pp. 155
- Blumler J. G., 2001, . Information, Communication & Society, 4, 1, 10.1080/713768514 · doi:10.1080/713768514
- Bohman J., 1996, Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy
- Cammaerts B., 2003, ICT-usage among transnational social movements in the networked society: To organize, to mediate, to influence
- Chambers S., 2000, Deliberation, democracy and the media
- Clift J., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values, pp. 157
- 10.1080/10584600050178933 · DOI
- Dahlgren P., 2000, Mass media and society, pp. 310
- Dahlgren P., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 5, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008804 · doi:10.1080/13183222.2002.11008804
- Dahlgren P., 2003, Media and political style: Essays on representation and civic culture, pp. 151
- Dewey J., 1954, The public and its problems
- Dryzek J., 1990, Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and political science, 10.1017/9781139173810 · DOI · Paper page
- Elster J., 1998, Deliberative democracy, 10.1017/CBO9781139175005 · DOI · Paper page
- Fenton N., 2003, Javnost/The Public, 10, 15, 10.1080/13183222.2003.11008819 · DOI
- Fishkin J., 1991, Democracy and deliberation
- Fraser N., 1992, Habermas and the public sphere, pp. 109
- Fung A., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 77, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008801 · doi:10.1080/13183222.2002.11008801
- Galston W. A., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values, pp. 35
- Giddens A., 1991, The consequences of modernity
- Graber D., 2003, The academy and Internet
- Habermas J., 1984, Theory of communicative action, 2
- Hagemann C., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 61, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008800 · doi:10.1080/13183222.2002.11008800
- Heikkilä H., 2003, Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 28, 157, 10.1515/comm.2003.011 · doi:10.1515/comm.2003.011
- Jenkins H., 2003, Democracy and new media, 10.7551/mitpress/2328.001.0001 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2328.001.0001
- Kalathil S., 2003, Open networks, closed regimes
- 10.1017/CBO9780511615023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-8675.00197 · DOI
- Lessig L., 1999, Code and other laws of cyberspace
- Lessig L., 2001, The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world
- Levine P., 2003, The civic web: Online politics and democratic values, pp. 47
- Lewis J., 2001, Constructing public opinion
- Malina A., 2003, Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 28, 135, 10.1515/comm.2003.010 · DOI
- Margolis M., 2000, Politics as usual: The cyberspace “revolution”, 10.4135/9781452233475 · DOI · Paper page
- Mouffe C., 1999, Social Research, 66, 745
- Negt O., 1993, The public sphere and experience
- Patekis K., 2000, Media organizations in society, pp. 84
- 10.1177/0090591797025003002 · DOI · Paper page
- Schiller D., 1999, Digital capitalism: Networking the global marketing system, 10.7551/mitpress/2415.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/016344300022002005 · DOI · Paper page
- Sparks C., 2001, Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy, pp. 75
- Splichal S., 1999, Public opinion: Developments and controversies in the twentieth century
- Stromer-Galley J., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 23, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008798 · DOI
- Tsaliki L., 2002, Javnost/The Public, 9, 95, 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008802 · DOI
- Wilhelm A. G., 2000, Democracy in the digital age
Cited by
Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12084 · Cited by 1,151
Lawrence, E., Sides, J., & Farrell, H. (2010) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592709992714 · Cited by 352
Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Ludovic Terren, L. T., & Rosa Borge-Bravo, R. B.-B. (2021) · Review of Communication Research · doi:10.12840/issn.2255-4165.028 · Cited by 272
Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers
Hargittai, E., Gallo, J., & Kane, M. (2007) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9201-x · Cited by 246
Facebooking It to the Polls: A Study in Online Social Networking and Political Behavior
Bode, L. (2012) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.709045 · Cited by 192
Digital social norm enforcement: Online firestorms in social media
Rost, K., Stahel, L., & Frey, B. S. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155923 · Cited by 190
Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates
Karlsen, R., Steen-Johnsen, K., Wollebæk, D., & Enjolras, B. (2017) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323117695734 · Cited by 154
Cho, D., & Kwon, K. H. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.046 · Cited by 107
‘The pussy ain’t worth it, bro’: assessing the discourse and structure of MGTOW
Wright, S., Trott, V., & Jones, C. (2020) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1751867 · Cited by 98
Three dimensions of the public sphere on Facebook
Batorski, D., & Grzywińska, I. (2018) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1281329 · Cited by 85
‘Echo Chambers’: Partisan Facebook Groups during the 2014 Thai Election
Grömping, M. (2014) · Asia Pacific Media Educator · doi:10.1177/1326365x14539185 · Cited by 61
Berg, S., & Hofmann, J. (2021) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2021.4.1612 · Cited by 64
Hartmann, D., Wang, S. M., Pohlmann, L., & Berendt, B. (2025) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-025-00381-z · Cited by 59
Fisher, C., Culloty, E., Lee, J. Y., & Park, S. (2019) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1519375 · Cited by 35
Darius, P. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w · Cited by 22
Redefining Publics: Mosireen, State Crime and the Rise of a Digital Public Sphere
Kasm, S. (2018) · State Crime Journal · doi:10.13169/statecrime.7.1.0100 · Cited by 7
Analyzing Political Information Network of the U.S. Partisan Public on Twitter
Chong, M. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_50 · Cited by 7
Wolfgang, D., & Jenkins, J. (2015) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.222 · Cited by 4
“Dahlgren (2005) argues similarly, “cyber ghettos threaten to undercut a shared public culture and the integrative societal function of the public sphere, and they may well even help foster intolerance where such communities have little contact with — or understanding of — one another” (p. 152).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahlgren, P.
- Venue
- Political Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-162
- ISSN
- 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-7675
- OpenAlex
- W1973033164
- Cited by
- 1,575
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 72.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.