Cited by 336Computational and Text Analysis MethodsSocial Media and PoliticsMisinformation and Its Impacts

Computational Research in the Post-API Age

Open access
Freelon, Deen·2018·Political Communication

Abstract

On April 4, 2018, the post-API age reached a milestone. On that day, Facebook closed access to its Pages API, which had allowed researchers to extract posts, comments, and associated metadata from ...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10584609.2018.1477506

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Facebook's recent closure of its Pages API impedes the legal and technical means of content extraction for research.

    “A current example includes Facebook's recent closure of its Pages API, which impedes the legal and technical means of content extraction for research (Freelon, 2018).”

    From How Dictators Control the Internet: A Review Essay (2020) · cites this paper as Freelon, 2018

  • There is precedent for concern about technology companies transitioning from generous data-sharing to restrictive practices.

    “There is precedent for concern about technology companies transitioning from generous data-sharing models to those that are highly restrictive.”

    From Can Generative AI improve social science? (2024) · cites this paper as [77]

  • In the early 2010s, many social media companies shared generous data with researchers, enabling new research and collaborations; in recent years, data-sharing at most large social media companies has been discontinued.

    “In the early 2010s, many companies shared generous amounts of data with researchers. This enabled entirely new forms of scholarly research, and social scientists and researchers inside industry frequently collaborated with each other and presented their work at conferences. In more recent years, data-sharing practices at most large social media companies have been discontinued (77).”

    From Can Generative AI improve social science? (2024) · cites this paper as [77]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freelon, D.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Freelon, Deen
Venue
Political Communication
Published
2018-10-02
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
665-668
ISSN
  • 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7675
OpenAlex
W2898441677
Cited by
336
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 17
FWCI
110.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Political Communication (publishedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
computational social science, research data access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review