Cited by 19Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Evaluation of a pathoplastic relationship between anxiety sensitivity and panic disorder

Schmidt, Norman B., Bates, Mark J.·2003·Anxiety, Stress & Coping

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that anxiety sensitivity (AS) acts as a specific vulnerability factor in the development of anxiety pathology. More recently, attention has turned to other relationships between AS and anxiety pathology. The present study explores a patholplasty model of AS. A pathoplasty model posits that a dispositional factor (e.g., AS) will affect the expression and/or course of the clinical condition (e.g., panic disorder). In other words, individual differences in AS among patients with panic disorder may be relevant to how the disorder is expressed or how it progresses over time regardless of the role of AS in the genesis of the disorder. The relationships among AS and the clinical facets of a sample of patients with panic disorder ( N = 147) were evaluated. Findings were consistent with the pathoplasty model and suggested: (1) significant variability in AS among patients, (2) AS variation was related to variability in symptom domains, co-occurring diagnoses, and medication use, and (3) variation in AS following treatment was predictive of clinical status at 6-month follow-up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1061580021000057013

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most mediation studies of CT for PD/A measure change in purported mediators and outcomes over the same interval or lack complete mediation models.

    “Most studies of mediation of CT for PD/A merely measure change in purported mediators (i.e., reappraisal) as well as outcomes (i.e., panic symptom reduction) across the same interval of time, from pre- to posttreatment”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, N. B., & Bates, M. J.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Anxiety, Stress & Coping
Published
2003-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
17-30
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2016375768
Cited by
19
References
44
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
anxiety sensitivity, panic disorder, vulnerability factors, individual differences, symptom domains, comorbidities, medication use, treatment response, clinical course

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review