Cited by 12Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

An examination of mindfulness skills in terms of affect tolerance among individuals with elevated levels of health anxiety.

Open access
O’Bryan, Emily M., Luberto, Christina M., Kraemer, Kristen M., McLeish, Alison C.·2018·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Affect tolerance factors, including anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and emotional distress tolerance, have been implicated in the exacerbation of health anxiety. Therefore, identifying methods to improve affect tolerance in health anxious populations is imperative. Despite the link between mindfulness and greater affect tolerance in non-clinical populations, no work has examined the role of mindfulness skills in terms of affect tolerance among individuals with elevated health anxiety. The aim of the current study was to examine the unique contribution of mindfulness skills in terms of distress tolerance, anxiety sensitivity, and intolerance of uncertainty.Methods: Participants were 218 undergraduates with clinically elevated levels of health anxiety (75.7% female; Mage = 19.53, SD = 3.16, Range = 18-45) who completed self-report measures for course credit.Results: Findings indicated that, after controlling for theoretically relevant covariates, greater acting with awareness, non-judgment, and non-reactivity were uniquely associated with greater distress tolerance, and greater non-reactivity was associated with lower levels of intolerance of uncertainty. Though none of the mindfulness skills emerged as specific individual predictors of anxiety sensitivity, these skills collectively accounted for unique variance in anxiety sensitivity.Conclusions: These findings suggest that mindfulness skills may be helpful in targeting affect tolerance factors among individuals with elevated health anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2018.1521515

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 43 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Mindfulness interventions have been shown to successfully decrease health anxiety.

    “Although mindfulness interventions have been shown to successfully decrease health anxiety (Eilenberg, Kronstrand, Fink, & Frostholm, 2013; Lovas & Barsky, 2010; McManus, Surawy, Muse, Vazquez-Montes, & Williams, 2012)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Eilenberg et al., 2013 source
    • cites Lovas & Barsky, 2010 source
    • cites McManus et al., 2012 source
  • Premisecitation

    Greater levels of observing alone are typically associated with worsened emotional outcomes in non-meditators.

    “greater levels of observing alone are typically associated with worsened emotional outcomes in non-meditators (Baer et al., 2006; Baer et al., 2016; Gu et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Baer et al., 2006 source

      Results and Discussion (p. 15) reports that observing was positively correlated with psychological symptoms, thought suppression, dissociation, and absent-mindedness in the full sample; these correlations were nonsignificant in the subsample with meditation experience. But the paper does not directly report those outcome correlations for non-meditators alone, and observing was also positively correlated with emotional intelligence and self-compassion. The claim overgeneralizes the pattern as typically worse emotional outcomes specifically among non-meditators. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Baer et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gu et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingown data

    None of the individual mindfulness skills were significant unique predictors of anxiety sensitivity.

    “Although none of the mindfulness skills were significant unique predictors of anxiety sensitivity, non-reactivity (β = −.15, t = −1.92, p = .056) approached significance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    After controlling for covariates, greater non-reactivity uniquely predicted lower intolerance of uncertainty.

    “Non-reactivity was the only significant unique predictor at this step (β = −.17, t = −2.18, p = .03)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    After controlling for gender, medical conditions, and negative affectivity, greater acting with awareness uniquely predicted greater distress tolerance.

    “higher levels of acting with awareness (β = .15, t = 2.48, p = .014), non-judgment (β = .27, t = 4.14, p < .001), and non-reactivity (β = .29, t = 4.81, p < .001) significantly predicted higher levels of distress tolerance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The FFMQ has demonstrated good psychometric properties.

    “The FFMQ has demonstrated good psychometric properties (Baer et al., 2006, Baer et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baer et al., 2006 source

      The General Discussion (p. 17) says the authors' findings suggest that the FFMQ has reasonable psychometric properties. Calling them definitively good overstates that qualified conclusion, particularly because the authors say the FFMQ needs extensive additional validation in a range of samples. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Baer et al., 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In non-health-anxious samples, higher mindfulness is associated with greater distress tolerance, lower anxiety sensitivity, and greater capacity for tolerating uncertainty.

    “cross-sectional work in non-health anxious samples indicates that higher levels of mindfulness are associated with greater distress tolerance, lower anxiety sensitivity, and a greater capacity for tolerating uncertainty (Brown, Bravo, Roos, & Pearson, 2015; Feldman, Dunn, Stemke, Bell, & Greeson, 2014; Kraemer, O’Bryan, & McLeish, 2016; Luberto, McLeish, Robertson, Avallone, Kraemer, & Jeffries, 2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brown et al., 2015 source

      The Results (Direct effects; page unavailable) associate several mindfulness facets with lower distress intolerance, supporting the greater-distress-tolerance part of the claim. The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) assess anxiety symptoms as worry, not anxiety sensitivity, and the passages do not report a measure or finding for tolerance of uncertainty. The Participants section describes a college-student sample, but does not establish participants’ health-anxiety status. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Feldman et al., 2014 source

      The Discussion reports that acting with awareness, one facet of mindfulness, predicted greater persistence on a distress-tolerance task; the Methods describe a sample of female undergraduates. The paper does not report associations with anxiety sensitivity or tolerance of uncertainty, and its finding does not extend to every mindfulness facet. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Kraemer et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Greater levels of mindfulness are thought to help individuals with health anxiety notice emotional distress and physical sensations in an open and accepting way, preventing catastrophic misinterpretations of bodily sensations and minimizing the need for reassurance-seeking behaviors.

    “Greater levels of mindfulness are thought to help individuals with health anxiety notice emotional distress and physical sensations in an open and accepting way, preventing catastrophic misinterpretations of bodily sensations and minimizing the need for reassurance-seeking behaviors (Luberto, Magidson, & Blashill, 2017; Surawy, McManus, Muse, & Williams, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Luberto, Magidson, & Blashill, 2017 source
    • cites Surawy, McManus, Muse, & Williams, 2015 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The observing skill appears, outside the context of other mindfulness skills or a history of meditation training, to be associated with a tendency to observe events in a judgmental fashion.

    “The observing skill was hypothesized to have a negative effect given that it appears, outside of the context of other mindfulness skills or a history of meditation training, to be associated with a tendency to observe events in a judgmental fashion (Baer, 2016; Baer et al., 2006; Gu et al., 2016; Luberto et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Baer, 2016 source
    • cites Baer et al., 2006 source
    • cites Gu et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Borderline on S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based): unclear from the text. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Negative affect was significantly positively correlated with anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty, and negatively correlated with distress tolerance.

    “Negative affect was significantly positively correlated with anxiety sensitivity (r = .41, p < .001) and intolerance of uncertainty (r = .42, p < .001), and significantly negatively correlated with distress tolerance (r = −.55, p < .001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Greater observing was not a unique predictor of any affect tolerance outcome and was not significantly correlated with these outcomes at the bivariate level.

    “this skill was not a unique predictor of any affect tolerance outcomes, nor was it significantly correlated with these outcomes at the bivariate level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    After controlling for covariates, greater non-reactivity uniquely predicted greater distress tolerance.

    “higher levels of acting with awareness (β = .15, t = 2.48, p = .014), non-judgment (β = .27, t = 4.14, p < .001), and non-reactivity (β = .29, t = 4.81, p < .001) significantly predicted higher levels of distress tolerance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    After controlling for covariates, greater non-judgment uniquely predicted greater distress tolerance.

    “higher levels of acting with awareness (β = .15, t = 2.48, p = .014), non-judgment (β = .27, t = 4.14, p < .001), and non-reactivity (β = .29, t = 4.81, p < .001) significantly predicted higher levels of distress tolerance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Describing was not a significant predictor of greater distress tolerance, lower anxiety sensitivity, or lower intolerance of uncertainty.

    “describing was not a significant predictor of greater distress tolerance, lower anxiety sensitivity, or lower intolerance of uncertainty.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All mindfulness skills except observing were significantly positively correlated with distress tolerance and negatively correlated with anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and negative affect.

    “All of the mindfulness skills except observing were significantly positively correlated with distress tolerance (range: .29 to .57) and significantly negatively correlated with anxiety sensitivity (range: −.22 to −.37), intolerance of uncertainty (range: −.27 to −.37), and negative affect (range: −.20 to −.45).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The mindfulness skills collectively accounted for unique variance in intolerance of uncertainty.

    “Step two was also significant and accounted for 6.8% of unique variance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All mindfulness skills were significantly positively correlated with one another except observing, which was only correlated with describing, non-judgment, and non-reactivity.

    “All mindfulness skills were significantly positively correlated with one another (range: .21 to .48) except observing, which was only correlated with describing (r = .23, p = .001), non-judgment (r = −.25, p < .001), and non-reactivity (r = .25, p < .001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mindfulness-based interventions successfully increase distress tolerance and reduce anxiety sensitivity in non-health-anxious samples.

    “intervention research suggests that mindfulness-based interventions successfully increase distress tolerance and reduce anxiety sensitivity in non-health anxious samples (Kim et al., 2010; Kraemer, Luberto, O’Bryan, Mysinger, & Cotton, 2016; Lotan, Tanay, & Bernstein, 2013; Tull, Schulzinger, Schmidt, Zvolensky, & Lejuez, 2007)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2010 source
    • cites Kraemer et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lotan et al., 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistency for the FFMQ subscales in the current sample was adequate for Observe (α = .72) and Non-reactivity (α = .73), and good for Describe (α = .85), Acting with Awareness (α = .85), and Non-judgment (α = .88).

    “Internal consistency was adequate for the Observe (α = .72) and Non-reactivity (α = .73) subscales, and good for the Describe (α = .85), Acting with Awareness (α = .85), and Non-judgment (α = .88) subscales.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistency for the PANAS-NA in the current sample was adequate (α = .82).

    “Internal consistency for the PANAS-NA in the current sample was adequate (α = .82).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The ASI-3 has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties.

    “The ASI-3 has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties (Taylor et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Taylor et al., 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Previous research has not examined the role of mindfulness skills in terms of multiple affect tolerance factors or studied these relationships in individuals with high health anxiety.

    “previous research has not examined the role of mindfulness skills in terms of multiple affect tolerance factors or studied these relationships in individuals with high health anxiety.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The PANAS has well-documented validity.

    “The validity of the PANAS has been well-documented (Watson, 2000; Watson et al., 1988).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Watson, 2000
    • cites Watson et al., 1988 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistency for the SHAI in the current sample was adequate (α = .74).

    “Internal consistency for the current sample was adequate (α = .74).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistency for the ASI-3 in the current sample was good (α = .88).

    “Internal consistency for the ASI-3 in the current sample was good (α = .88).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The DTS has demonstrated strong psychometric properties.

    “The DTS has demonstrated strong psychometric properties (Simons & Gaher, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Simons & Gaher, 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The IUS-12 has demonstrated strong psychometric properties.

    “The IUS-12 has demonstrated strong psychometric properties (Carleton et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carleton et al., 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study used a cross-sectional design and relied solely on self-report indices of mindfulness and affect tolerance.

    “the current study relied solely on self-report indices of mindfulness and affect tolerance and regulation and utilized a cross-sectional design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Missing data were approximately 5% or less for each study variable, and listwise deletion was used.

    “Approximately 5% of data or less were missing for each study variable, indicating that listwise deletion would be an appropriate method for handling missing data (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007); as such, results of all statistical tests are reflective of individuals who had adequate data for the specified analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistency for the DTS in the current sample was excellent (α = .91).

    “Internal consistency for the current sample was excellent (α = .91).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The SHAI is valid for use in medical populations.

    “research has indicated that the SHAI is valid for use in medical populations (LeBouthillier, Thibodeau, Alberts, Hadjistavropoulos, & Asmundson, 2015)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites LeBouthillier et al., 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistency for the IUS-12 in the current sample was excellent (α = .91).

    “Internal consistency for the current sample was excellent (α = .91).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Psychopathology typically emerges in young adulthood.

    “this population may be important given that psychopathology typically emerges in young adulthood (Kessler et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kessler et al., 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The use of undergraduate samples in the study of health anxiety can be helpful because they are less confounded with serious medical problems.

    “it has been suggested that the use of undergraduate samples in the study of health anxiety can be helpful due to the fact that they are less confounded with serious medical problems (Kaur, Butow, & Sharpe, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kaur, Butow, & Sharpe, 2013 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Covariates were chosen on an a priori basis given their relevance to health anxiety and affect tolerance.

    “Covariates were chosen on an a priori basis given their relevance to health anxiety and affect tolerance (e.g., Abramowitz, Olatunji, & Deacon, 2007; Freeston, Rheaume, Letarte, Dugas, & Ladouceur, 1994; Jang, Stein, Taylor, & Livesley, 1998; MacSwain et al., 2009; McLeish, Luberto, & O’Bryan, 2015; O’Cleirigh, Ironson, & Smits, 2007; Roy-Byrne et al., 2008; Simons & Gaher, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Abramowitz, Olatunji, & Deacon, 2007 source
    • cites Freeston et al., 1994 source
    • cites Simons & Gaher, 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    There has been little exploration of the relationship between mindfulness and the affect tolerance factors that underlie health anxiety.

    “there has been little exploration of the relationship between mindfulness and the affect tolerance factors that underlie health anxiety.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Greater mindfulness, in general, is related to greater distress tolerance and lower anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty among individuals who are high in health anxiety.

    “results of the current study suggest that greater mindfulness, in general, is related to greater distress tolerance and lower anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty among individuals who are high in health anxiety.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Mindfulness skills can be learned with practice and are therefore targetable in interventions.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Negative affect was controlled to more precisely estimate the relationship between mindfulness and affect tolerance.

    “Specifically, we controlled for negative affect to more precisely estimate the relationship between mindfulness and affect tolerance, given that the general tendency to experience negative affect is related to the ability to tolerate affect (Simons & Gaher, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Simons & Gaher, 2005 source
33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mindfulness skills can be learned with practice and are therefore targetable in interventions.

    “in clinical applications, is thought to consist of several skills that can be learned with practice.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of behavioural and mindful coping strategies may help alleviate anxiety through a process akin to acceptance and active engagement.

    “The use of behavioural and mindful coping strategies may help alleviate anxiety, through a process akin to acceptance and active engagement, supporting previous research on the putative benefits of mindfulness [64] and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) [65] for health anxiety.”

    From Health anxiety, coping mechanisms and COVID 19: An Indian community sample at week 1 of lockdown (2021) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Discussion (page not available) links mindful awareness and nonjudgment with greater tolerance of distress in people with elevated health anxiety, and proposes acceptance as a possible mechanism. It suggests mindfulness training may improve related factors, but the study was cross-sectional and did not test whether coping strategies alleviate anxiety. The separate ACT citation is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness-based strategies may reduce health anxiety by increasing tolerance of uncertainty experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Mindfulness-based strategies may reduce health anxiety by increasing tolerance of uncertainty experienced during the COVID 19 pandemic.”

    From Health anxiety, coping mechanisms and COVID 19: An Indian community sample at week 1 of lockdown (2021) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that greater mindfulness was associated with lower intolerance of uncertainty in people with elevated health anxiety and suggests mindfulness training may help. But the study was cross-sectional: it did not show that a strategy reduces health anxiety through that mechanism, and it did not study uncertainty during the COVID-19 pandemic. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Participant age differs between abstract and method section

    Minor

    The abstract reports one mean age for the sample, while the Participants subsection reports a different mean age for the same 218 undergraduates. This is an internal inconsistency in the description of the sample.

  • Condition frequencies do not support the reported average

    Minor

    The listed condition percentages sum to 95.4%, implying about 0.954 listed conditions per participant, rather than the reported average of 1.24.

  • Participant age statistics differ between the abstract and methods

    Minor

    The same 218-participant sample is assigned a mean age of 19.53 years and SD of 3.16 in the abstract, but a mean of 19.61 and SD of 3.27 in the methods.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jang K. L., 1998, The Journal of Gender-Specific Medicine, 2, 39

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Bryan, E. M., Luberto, C. M., Kraemer, K. M., & McLeish, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
McLeish, Alison C.
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2018-09-11
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
702-713
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2891007037
Cited by
11
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training Grant (UL-RR026314)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH T32AT000051-16)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
mindfulness skills, affect tolerance, health anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, distress tolerance, non-judgment, non-reactivity, acting with awareness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Students, Universities, Uncertainty, Young Adult, Self Report, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review