Cited by 192Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

The effects of safety behaviors on health anxiety: An experimental investigation

Olatunji, Bunmi O., Etzel, Erin N., Tomarken, Andrew J., Ciesielski, Bethany G., Deacon, Brett·2011·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The present study examined the extent to which safety behaviors exacerbate symptoms of hypochondriasis (severe health anxiety). Participants were randomized into a safety behavior (n=30) or control condition (n=30). After a baseline period, participants in the safety behavior condition spent one week actively engaging in a clinically representative array of health-related safety behaviors on a daily basis, followed by a second week-long baseline period. Participants in the control condition monitored their normal use of safety behaviors. Compared to control participants, those in the safety behavior condition reported significantly greater increases in health anxiety, hypochondriacal beliefs, contamination fear, and avoidant responses to health-related behavioral tasks after the safety behavior manipulation. In contrast, general anxiety symptoms did not significantly differ between the two groups as a function of the manipulation. Mediational analyses were consistent with the hypothesis that changes in the frequency of health-related thoughts mediated the effects of the experimental manipulation on health anxiety. These findings suggest that safety behaviors are associated with increases in health anxiety, perhaps by fostering catastrophic thoughts about health. The implications of these findings for the conceptualization of hypochondriasis as an anxiety disorder are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2011.07.008

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olatunji, B. O., Etzel, E. N., Tomarken, A. J., Ciesielski, B. G., & Deacon, B.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
Olatunji, Bunmi O.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
719-728
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127217888
Cited by
192
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
safety behavior, health anxiety, catastrophic thinking, fear of contamination, avoidance behavior, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Avoidance Learning, Fear, Female, Health Status, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Patient Compliance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Safety, Health Behavior, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review