Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 913

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of Two-Block Partial Least-Squares to Study Covariation in Shape

Rohlf, F. James, Corti, Marco·2000·Systematic Biology

Abstract

The relatively new two-block partial least-squares method for analyzing the covariance between two sets of variables is described and contrasted with the well-known method of canonical correlation analysis. Their statistical properties, type of answers, and visualization techniques are discussed. Examples are given to show its usefulness in comparing two sets of variables--especially when one or both of the sets of variables are shape variables from a geometric morphometric study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/106351500750049806

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 913

Metadata

Authors
Rohlf, F. J., & Corti, M.
Venue
Systematic Biology
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
740-753
ISSN
  • 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1076-836X
OpenAlex
W2098068460
Cited by
913
References
22
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Two-Block Partial Least-Squares to Study Covariation in Shape. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/106351500750049806
The paper
Rohlf, F. J., & Corti, M. (2000). Use of Two-Block Partial Least-Squares to Study Covariation in Shape. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351500750049806

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.