The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential Applications and Pitfalls of Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny
Abstract
Only recently has Bayesian inference of phylogeny been proposed. The method is now a practical alternative to the other methods; indeed, the method appears to possess advantages over the other methods in terms of ability to use complex models of evolution, ease of interpretation of the results, and computational efficiency. However, the method should be used cautiously. The results of a Bayesian analysis should be examined with respect to the sensitivity of the results to the priors used and the reliability of the Markov chain Monte Carlo approximation of the probabilities of trees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Practical markov chain monte carlo
Geyer, C. J. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011137 · Cited by 2,045
Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution
Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H., & Painter, I. S. (1998) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025892 · Cited by 1,317
Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data.
Thorne, J. L., & Kishino, H. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290102456 · Cited by 962
Aris-Brosou, S., & Yang, Z. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290102375 · Cited by 230 · cited 3×
“For example, Rannala and Yang (1996) placed a birth–death prior on trees, giving equal weight to labeled histories.”
BackgroundMethodBayesian Model Adequacy and Choice in Phylogenetics
Bollback, J. P. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004175 · Cited by 215
Identifiability of Parameters in MCMC Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny
Rannala, B. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290102429 · Cited by 190
Cited by
Posada, D., & Buckley, T. R. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490522304 · Cited by 3,927
Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative
Anisimova, M., & Gascuel, O. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150600755453 · Cited by 2,693
A Bayesian Mixture Model for Across-Site Heterogeneities in the Amino-Acid Replacement Process
Lartillot, N., & Philippe, H. (2004) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msh112 · Cited by 1,516
A review of long-branch attraction
Bergsten, J. (2005) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x · Cited by 1,162
Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration.
Lartillot, N., & Philippe, H. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150500433722 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Huelsenbeck, J. P., Larget, B., Miller, R. E., & Ronquist, F.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 673-688
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2152886327
- Cited by
- 812
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 24.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
