Cited by 675Food Industry and Aquatic BiologyAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthFood and Agricultural Sciences

Fish Matters: Importance of Aquatic Foods in Human Nutrition and Global Food Supply

Tacon, Albert G. J., Metian, Marc·2013·Reviews in Fisheries Science

Abstract

In a world where nearly 30% of humanity is suffering from malnutrition and over 70% of the planet is covered with water, aquatic foods represent an essential component of the global food basket to improve the nutrition, health, and well being of all peoples. It is not by chance that Japan, the country with one of the world's highest reported life expectancies and lowest incidences of obesity and deaths from heart related illnesses, is also one of the world's top consumers of captured and farmed aquatic animal food products and aquatic plants. According to the FAO, in 2009, total captured and farmed aquatic animal food products accounted for 16.6% of the global population's intake of animal protein, providing more than three billion people with almost 20% of their average per capita intake of animal protein, and 4.3 billion people with at least 15% of such protein. This article reviews the nutritional composition of different farmed and captured aquatic food products and compares these with conventional terrestrial meat products. In addition to the superior nutritional profile and benefits of aquatic animal food products, small-sized marine pelagic fish play an important role in the nutrition of the poor as an affordable and much needed source of high quality animal protein and essential amino acids, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamins, minerals, and trace elements. As one of the best aquatic animal foods from a nutritional perspective, the direct consumption of small pelagic fish should be encouraged and promoted, as apposed to the continued targeted use of these species for reduction into fishmeal and fish oil for use in animal feeds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10641262.2012.753405

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tacon, A. G. J., & Metian, M.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Reviews in Fisheries Science
Published
2013-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
22-38
ISSN
  • 1064-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6553
OpenAlex
W2128123877
Cited by
675
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 2
FWCI
36.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reviews in Fisheries Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
aquatic foods, fish nutrition, small pelagic fish, animal protein, omega-3 fatty acids, essential amino acids, nutritional composition, malnutrition, global food supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review