The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices
Open accessAbstract
(1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal: Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 119-143.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns.
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265 · Cited by 2,880
Self-citationA comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables
Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x · Cited by 1,778
The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-Fit Indices
HOELTER, J. W. (1983) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124183011003003 · Cited by 1,624
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1007/BF02294170 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson T. W., 1956, Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 111
- 10.2307/3151716 · DOI · Paper page
- Bentler P. M., 1989, EQS structural equations program manual
- Bentler P. M., 1992, EQS structural equations program manual
- 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI · Paper page
- Bentler P. M., 1990, EQS structural equations program manual (PC)
- Bollen K. A., 1993, Testing structural equation models, 1
- Boomsma A., 1982, Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Part I)
- 10.1007/BF02294248 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr2504_3 · DOI
- Browne M. W., 1974, South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_5 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_1 · DOI
- Fava J. L., 1993, The effects of underextraction in factor and component analysis
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr2003_2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02293958 · DOI · Paper page
- Gerbing D. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, 40
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr2802_3 · DOI
- Harlow L. L., 1985, Behavioral of some elliptical theory estimators with nonnormal data in a covariance structural framework: A Monte Carlo study
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351 · Paper page
- 10.2190/BJF9-XCV5-EWNN-PBGY · DOI
- 10.2307/1130297 · DOI
- James L. R., 1982, Causal analysis: Models, assumptions, and data
- Jöreskog K. G., 1981, LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood
- 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.625 · DOI
- Long J. S., 1983, Covariance structure models—An introduction to LISREL, 10.4135/9781412983822 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF01908590 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.247 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.247 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430 · DOI · Paper page
- Muthén B., 1992, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171, 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x · DOI · Paper page
- Tanaka J. S., 1993, Testing structural equation models, 10
- 10.1007/BF02291170 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/001316447403400309 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr2202_4 · DOI
- Velicer W. F., 1993, The effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr1703_5 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics
Iacobucci, D. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003 · Cited by 2,263
Kyriazos, T. A. (2018) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2018.98126 · Cited by 1,882
Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling
Christopher Westland, J. (2010) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003 · Cited by 1,846
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L.
- Venue
- Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-143
- ISSN
- 1070-5511 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2046805344
- Cited by
- 789
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10705519509540000
- The paper
- Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.