Cited by 63Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsSurfactants and Colloidal Systems

Sequestration and Ultrasound-Induced Release of Doxorubicin from Stabilized Pluronic P105 Micelles

Open access
Pruitt, John D., Pitt, William G.·2002·Drug Delivery

Abstract

Controlled drug delivery from micelles requires that the micelles remain stable when diluted below their critical micelle concentration, such as upon injection into blood. A cross-linked, interpenetrating network of N,N-diethylacrylamide (NNDEA) was polymerized in the core of Pluronic P105 micelles to stabilize temporarily the micelles at concentrations below the critical micellar concentration of free P105. The stabilized Pluronic micelles (called Plurogels) were able to sequester the drug doxorubicin (Dox) and protect HL-60 cells from the drug at concentrations where non-stabilized Pluronic provided no protection. The protection lasted approximately 12 hr, which is similar to the half-life of the particles. Application of low-frequency ultrasound resulted in a synergistic killing effect with Dox and low concentrations of either Pluronic P105 or stabilized Plurogels, most probably due to release of Dox and permeabilization of the cell membrane.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10717540260397873

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pruitt and Pitt developed an approach in which DOX stabilized with PEG-phospholipid was encapsulated in ultrasound-sensitive nanomicelles.

    “Another approach has been developed by Pruitt and Pitt in which DOX stabilized with PEG-phospholipid was encapsulated in ultrasound-sensitive nanomicelles [207].”

    From Recent Advances in Nanomicelles Delivery Systems. (2020) · cites this paper as [207]

    The Abstract reports that stabilized Pluronic P105 micelles sequester doxorubicin and respond to low-frequency ultrasound. But it identifies the stabilizer as a cross-linked N,N-diethylacrylamide network, not PEG-phospholipid; the Materials section likewise lists the former components. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In vivo studies revealed that the release of DOX was significantly increased upon treatment with ultrasound that, as a result, retarded tumor growth higher than without treatment.

    “In vivo studies revealed that the release of DOX was significantly increased upon treatment with ultrasound that, as a result, retarded tumor growth higher than without treatment.”

    From Recent Advances in Nanomicelles Delivery Systems. (2020) · cites this paper as [207]

    The Sonicated Cell Experiments section reports that ultrasound releases some DOX from micelles and increases DOX-associated cell death. But it explicitly says the results presented are from one cell line in vitro; it gives no comparison of tumor growth with and without ultrasound in vivo. The rat colon cancer results are described only as encouraging and to be reported elsewhere (page unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pruitt, J. 2001. Stabilization of Pluronic P-105 for targeted nanoparticle drug delivery. Dissertation, Chemical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pruitt, J. D., & Pitt, W. G.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Venue
Drug Delivery
Published
2002-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
253-258
ISSN
  • 1071-7544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0464
OpenAlex
W1969042044
Cited by
63
References
17
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Delivery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
Keywords
doxorubicin, Pluronic P105, micelle stabilization, N,N-diethylacrylamide, crosslinked polymer networks, low-frequency ultrasound, HL-60 cells, drug sequestration, controlled drug delivery, cell membrane permeabilization, synergistic cytotoxicity
MeSH terms
Doxorubicin, Excipients, Humans, Micelles, Ultrasonics, HL-60 Cells, Poloxamer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review