Cited by 36Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and TreatmentsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Predictors for (Problematic) Use of Internet Sexually Explicit Material: Role of Trait Sexual Motivation and Implicit Approach Tendencies Towards Sexually Explicit Material

Stark, Rudolf, Kruse, Onno, Snagowski, Jan, Brand, Matthias, Walter, Bertram, Klucken, Tim, Wehrum-Osinsky, Sina·2017·Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity

Abstract

Problematic use of Internet sexually explicit material (SEM) is thought to be a possible precursor of a clinically relevant disorder labeled as hypersexuality, sexual compulsion, sexual impulse control disorder, or sexual addiction. Knowledge about possible risk factors for developing a problematic Internet SEM use is scarce. The present study investigated whether trait sexual motivation and implicit approach tendencies towards sexual material are predictors of problematic SEM use and of the daily time spent watching SEM. Trait sexual motivation describes the general individual motivation to be sexually active in a long-lasting, trait-like perspective and can be measured by the Trait Sexual Motivation Questionnaire. In a behavioral experiment, we used the Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) for measuring implicit approach tendencies towards sexual material. Symptoms of problematic Internet SEM use were assessed by the short Internet Addiction Test, modified for cybersex. Trait sexual motivation explained more variance of problematic Internet SEM use than implicit approach tendencies measured by the AAT. This was true for men as well as for women. Implicit approach tendencies towards SEM were correlated with trait sexual motivation, which could point to a common biological basis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10720162.2017.1329042

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stark, R., Kruse, O., Snagowski, J., Brand, M., Walter, B., Klucken, T., & Wehrum-Osinsky, S.
Affiliations
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • University of Siegen (DE)
  • Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
Corresponding author
Stark, Rudolf
Venue
Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity
Published
2017-07-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
180-202
ISSN
  • 1072-0162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5318
OpenAlex
W2744230441
Cited by
36
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity The Journal of Treatment and Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
problematic internet use, sexually explicit material, sexual addiction, hypersexuality, compulsive sexual behavior, cybersex, risk factors, approach-avoidance task, Internet Addiction Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review