Cited by 272Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studies

The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the ‘Pornography Addiction’ Model

Ley, David, Prause, Nicole, Finn, Peter·2014·Current Sexual Health Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11930-014-0016-8

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ley, D., Prause, N., & Finn, P.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Ley, David
Venue
Current Sexual Health Reports
Published
2014-02-12
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
94-105
ISSN
  • 1548-3584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-3592
OpenAlex
W2045933619
Cited by
272
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
22.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Sexual Health Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pornography addiction, visual sexual stimuli, addiction models, erectile dysfunction, neural adaptation, sexual orientation, gender differences, sexual desire, sensation seeking, religiosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review