Cited by 51Teaching and Learning ProgrammingInnovative Education and Learning PracticesTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Picking Up the Mantle of “Expert”: Assigned Roles, Assertion of Identity, and Peer Recognition Within a Programming Class

Fields, Deborah, Enyedy, Noel·2013·Mind, Culture, and Activity

Abstract

Changing an established role in a classroom is difficult. It involves constructing a new set of relations within a community. In this article we investigate how students with newly developed interest and experience in programming developed outside the classroom pick up and establish their roles as experts in programming within the classroom community. More specifically, we focus on how two 11-year-old software designers shifted their established roles in their classroom to gain status as expert programmers. We use an identity lens to understand how peer expertise was established in the context of a classroom community, adopting a multifaceted perspective of identity by focusing on an individual's narrativization of self, full, or peripheral participation among a group of people, and individuals' social recognition by others. Our findings point to the importance of both positive positioning by authority figures in the classroom and activities and roles that provide opportunities to establish intersubjectivity among peers in facilitating students' identities as experts in the classroom. Students' willingness to take up a new position in the established activity system also played a role. We consider implications of how making roles flexible within classroom stratification may provide opportunities for more students see themselves as experts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10749039.2012.691199

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Brickhouse N. W., 2001, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965, 10.1002/tea.1041 · DOI
  2. Brown B., 2005, Science Education, 89, 779, 10.1002/sce.20069 · DOI
  3. Charmaz K., 2000, Handbook of qualitative research, 509
  4. Ching C. C., 2008, Teachers College Record, 110, 2601, 10.1177/016146810811001203 · DOI
  5. Cobb P., 1992, American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573, 10.3102/00028312029003573 · DOI
  6. Cole M., 1993, Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 1
  7. Coll L., 2010, Revista de Educación, 353, 211
  8. Dreier O., 2008, Psychotherapy in everyday life
  9. Erickson F., 2006, Handbook of complementary methods in educational research, 177
  10. Erickson F., 1982, Doing the ethnography of schooling, 131
  11. Erikson E. H., 1968, Identity: Youth and crisis
  12. Fields D. A., 2010, Trajectories of identification across social spaces: Intersections between home, school, and everyday settings (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
  13. Fleer M., 2010, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 149, 10.1080/10749030903222760 · DOI
  14. Gee J. P., 2000, Review of Research in Education, 25, 99
  15. Hedegaard M., 2011, Children, development and education: Cultural, historical, anthropological perspectives, 117, 10.1007/978-94-007-0243-1_8 · DOI
  16. Hull G. A., 2006, Research in the Teaching of English, 41, 43, 10.58680/rte20065995 · DOI
  17. Kafai Y. B., 2010, Journal of Organizational and End-User Computing, 22, 21, 10.4018/joeuc.2010101906 · DOI
  18. Kelleher C., 2005, ACM Computing Surveys, 37, 83, 10.1145/1089733.1089734 · DOI
  19. Leander K. M., 2002, Research in the Teaching of English, 37, 198, 10.58680/rte20021770 · DOI
  20. Leander K. M., 2008, Handbook of research on new literacies, 33
  21. Leander K. M., 2006, Cognition and Instruction, 24, 291, 10.1207/s1532690xci2403_1 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lemke J. L., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 37
  23. Lemke J. L., 2000, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273, 10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03 · DOI
  24. Ligoro M. B., 2010, Culture & Psychology, 16, 93, 10.1177/1354067X09353206 · DOI
  25. McDermott R., 1993, Understanding practice, 269, 10.1017/CBO9780511625510.011 · DOI
  26. Moll L. C., 1993, Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 139
  27. Nasir N. S., 2011, Journal of African American Males in Education, 2, 24
  28. Oakes J., 1999, Contemporary issues in curriculum (2nd ed., 224
  29. O'Connor M. C., 1996, Discourse, learning, and schooling, 63, 10.1017/CBO9780511720390.003 · DOI
  30. Penuel P. R., 1995, Educational Psychologist, 30, 83, 10.1207/s15326985ep3002_5 · DOI
  31. Polman J. L., 2010, Revista de Educación, 353, 129
  32. Resnick M., 2009, Communications of the ACM, 52, 60, 10.1145/1592761.1592779 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Ritchie S. M., 2002, Research in Science Education, 32, 35, 10.1023/A:1015046621428 · DOI
  34. Schoenfeld A, 1992, Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning, 334
  35. Sfard A., 2008, Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing, 10.1017/CBO9780511499944 · DOI
  36. Sfard A., 2005, Educational Researcher, 34, 14, 10.3102/0013189X034004014 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Silseth K., 2011, Culture & Psychology, 17, 65, 10.1177/1354067X10388842 · DOI
  38. Stepulevage L., 1999, Information, Communication & Society, 2, 399, 10.1080/136911899359475 · DOI
  39. Stevens R., 2008, Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 355, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00984.x · DOI
  40. Vågan A., 2011, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18, 43, 10.1080/10749031003605839 · DOI
  41. Wenger E., 1998, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, 10.1017/CBO9780511803932 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Wortham S., 2004, Ethos, 32, 164, 10.1525/eth.2004.32.2.164 · DOI
  43. Wortham S., 2006, Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning
  44. Wortham S., 2008, Linguistics & Education, 19, 294, 10.1016/j.linged.2008.05.010 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review

    Verhoeven, M., Poorthuis, A. M. G., & Volman, M. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9457-3 · Cited by 318

    “Three studies in which sociocultural perspectives are adopted and that are based on various ethnographic research methods (Fields & Enyedy, 2013; Ideland & Malmberg, 2012; Volman & Ten Dam, 2007), were concerned with and found that peers may deny each other access to certain identity positions…”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential

Metadata

Authors
Fields, D., & Enyedy, N.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Fields, Deborah
Venue
Mind, Culture, and Activity
Published
2013-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
113-131
ISSN
  • 1074-9039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7884
OpenAlex
W2041606303
Cited by
51
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mind Culture and Activity (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
expert identity, peer recognition, programming education, student role, classroom community, intersubjectivity, social status, activity systems, junior high school students, software design, identity construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review