The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Picking Up the Mantle of “Expert”: Assigned Roles, Assertion of Identity, and Peer Recognition Within a Programming Class
Abstract
Changing an established role in a classroom is difficult. It involves constructing a new set of relations within a community. In this article we investigate how students with newly developed interest and experience in programming developed outside the classroom pick up and establish their roles as experts in programming within the classroom community. More specifically, we focus on how two 11-year-old software designers shifted their established roles in their classroom to gain status as expert programmers. We use an identity lens to understand how peer expertise was established in the context of a classroom community, adopting a multifaceted perspective of identity by focusing on an individual's narrativization of self, full, or peripheral participation among a group of people, and individuals' social recognition by others. Our findings point to the importance of both positive positioning by authority figures in the classroom and activities and roles that provide opportunities to establish intersubjectivity among peers in facilitating students' identities as experts in the classroom. Students' willingness to take up a new position in the established activity system also played a role. We consider implications of how making roles flexible within classroom stratification may provide opportunities for more students see themselves as experts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Three studies in which sociocultural perspectives are adopted and that are based on various ethnographic research methods (Fields and Enyedy 2013; Ideland and Malmberg 2012; V olman and Ten Dam 2007) were concerned with and found that peers may deny each other access to certain identity positions through peer norms.”
From The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Fields and Enyedy 2013
In the citing paper
“Fields and Enyedy (2013) found that, even though the teacher of the programming class made the identity position of an attentive expert available to one of the students in this class, his peers refused to regard this student as such. This student ' s classmates appeared to do so, because the student who was now trying to help out his classmates was better and longer known by them for his sarcasm,”
From The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Fields and Enyedy 2013
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Complex dilemmas of identity and practice
Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2006) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20096 · Cited by 222
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Brickhouse N. W., 2001, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965, 10.1002/tea.1041 · DOI
- Brown B., 2005, Science Education, 89, 779, 10.1002/sce.20069 · DOI
- Charmaz K., 2000, Handbook of qualitative research, 509
- Ching C. C., 2008, Teachers College Record, 110, 2601, 10.1177/016146810811001203 · DOI
- Cobb P., 1992, American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573, 10.3102/00028312029003573 · DOI
- Cole M., 1993, Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 1
- Coll L., 2010, Revista de Educación, 353, 211
- Dreier O., 2008, Psychotherapy in everyday life
- Erickson F., 2006, Handbook of complementary methods in educational research, 177
- Erickson F., 1982, Doing the ethnography of schooling, 131
- Erikson E. H., 1968, Identity: Youth and crisis
- Fields D. A., 2010, Trajectories of identification across social spaces: Intersections between home, school, and everyday settings (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
- Fleer M., 2010, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 149, 10.1080/10749030903222760 · DOI
- Gee J. P., 2000, Review of Research in Education, 25, 99
- Hedegaard M., 2011, Children, development and education: Cultural, historical, anthropological perspectives, 117, 10.1007/978-94-007-0243-1_8 · DOI
- Hull G. A., 2006, Research in the Teaching of English, 41, 43, 10.58680/rte20065995 · DOI
- Kafai Y. B., 2010, Journal of Organizational and End-User Computing, 22, 21, 10.4018/joeuc.2010101906 · DOI
- Kelleher C., 2005, ACM Computing Surveys, 37, 83, 10.1145/1089733.1089734 · DOI
- Leander K. M., 2002, Research in the Teaching of English, 37, 198, 10.58680/rte20021770 · DOI
- Leander K. M., 2008, Handbook of research on new literacies, 33
- Leander K. M., 2006, Cognition and Instruction, 24, 291, 10.1207/s1532690xci2403_1 · DOI · Paper page
- Lemke J. L., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 37
- Lemke J. L., 2000, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273, 10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03 · DOI
- Ligoro M. B., 2010, Culture & Psychology, 16, 93, 10.1177/1354067X09353206 · DOI
- McDermott R., 1993, Understanding practice, 269, 10.1017/CBO9780511625510.011 · DOI
- Moll L. C., 1993, Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 139
- Nasir N. S., 2011, Journal of African American Males in Education, 2, 24
- Oakes J., 1999, Contemporary issues in curriculum (2nd ed., 224
- O'Connor M. C., 1996, Discourse, learning, and schooling, 63, 10.1017/CBO9780511720390.003 · DOI
- Penuel P. R., 1995, Educational Psychologist, 30, 83, 10.1207/s15326985ep3002_5 · DOI
- Polman J. L., 2010, Revista de Educación, 353, 129
- Resnick M., 2009, Communications of the ACM, 52, 60, 10.1145/1592761.1592779 · DOI · Paper page
- Ritchie S. M., 2002, Research in Science Education, 32, 35, 10.1023/A:1015046621428 · DOI
- Schoenfeld A, 1992, Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning, 334
- Sfard A., 2008, Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing, 10.1017/CBO9780511499944 · DOI
- Sfard A., 2005, Educational Researcher, 34, 14, 10.3102/0013189X034004014 · DOI · Paper page
- Silseth K., 2011, Culture & Psychology, 17, 65, 10.1177/1354067X10388842 · DOI
- Stepulevage L., 1999, Information, Communication & Society, 2, 399, 10.1080/136911899359475 · DOI
- Stevens R., 2008, Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 355, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00984.x · DOI
- Vågan A., 2011, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18, 43, 10.1080/10749031003605839 · DOI
- Wenger E., 1998, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, 10.1017/CBO9780511803932 · DOI · Paper page
- Wortham S., 2004, Ethos, 32, 164, 10.1525/eth.2004.32.2.164 · DOI
- Wortham S., 2006, Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning
- Wortham S., 2008, Linguistics & Education, 19, 294, 10.1016/j.linged.2008.05.010 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review
Verhoeven, M., Poorthuis, A. M. G., & Volman, M. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9457-3 · Cited by 318
“Three studies in which sociocultural perspectives are adopted and that are based on various ethnographic research methods (Fields & Enyedy, 2013; Ideland & Malmberg, 2012; Volman & Ten Dam, 2007), were concerned with and found that peers may deny each other access to certain identity positions…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Fields, D., & Enyedy, N.
- Affiliations
- Utah State University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fields, Deborah
- Venue
- Mind, Culture, and Activity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-131
- ISSN
- 1074-9039 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7884
- OpenAlex
- W2041606303
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mind Culture and Activity (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- expert identity, peer recognition, programming education, student role, classroom community, intersubjectivity, social status, activity systems, junior high school students, software design, identity construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review