Cited by 49Spinal Cord Injury ResearchStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Functional Electrical Stimulation For Walking In Paraplegia: 17-Year Follow-Up Of 2 Cases

Agarwal, Sanjeev, Kobetic, Rudi, Nandurkar, Sanjay, Marsolais, E.B.·2003·The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of long-term use of functional electrical stimulation (FES) for exercise, standing, and walking in individuals with paraplegia, using percutaneous intramuscular wire electrodes. DESIGN: Case study with more than 17 years of follow-up. SETTING: Institutional rehabilitation practice. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Two long-term (17 years) volunteer participants with paraplegia who were able to stand and walk using FES. INTERVENTION: Chronically indwelling percutaneous intramuscular wire electrodes connected to a portable microprocessor-controlled stimulator were used to exercise muscles while controlling trunk, hips, knees, and ankles and develop activation patterns to produce standing and walking. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical complications, electrode performance and survival probability, and functional performance. RESULTS: The most noted clinical complications included localized inflammation at the electrode site and superficial infection that responded well to topical and oral antibiotic treatment. The change from coil-wire electrodes, with a survival of 35% after 1 year, to double-helix electrodes improved electrode survival to 80% at 1 year and 48% at 5 years. Maintenance of the multichannel percutaneous FES walking system required replacement of an average of 2 electrodes every 6 months. Participants were able to use their system for independent exercise and standing and for walking with standby assistance. CONCLUSION: Although the FES system was devised as a temporary means of achieving functional activation until permanent means could be achieved, it was found to be effective and relatively safe for more than 17 years. Two long-time users of the system had no adverse effects to their skeletal system. The most common problems were daily care of electrodes at exit sites, frequent irritation of the skin around electrodes, and replacement of failed electrodes. The percutaneous system has the potential for short-term rehabilitation in individuals with incomplete paraplegia or stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10790268.2003.11753666

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agarwal, S., Kobetic, R., Nandurkar, S., & Marsolais, E. B.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
  • Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kobetic, Rudi
Venue
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Published
2003-03
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
86-91
ISSN
  • 1079-0268 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-7723
OpenAlex
W23271243
Cited by
49
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
functional electrical stimulation, paraplegia, long-term follow-up, standing, physical activity, incomplete paraplegia, stroke rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paraplegia, Posture, Spinal Cord Injuries, Time Factors, Exercise, Walking, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review