Cited by 156Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryPain Management and TreatmentSpinal Cord Injury Research

Functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve for hemiplegia. Long-term clinical follow-up.

Waters, R L, McNeal, D R, Faloon, W, Clifford, B·1985·The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-198567050-00016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waters, R. L., McNeal, D. R., Faloon, W., & Clifford, B.
Venue
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
Published
1985-06
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
792-793
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W130055011
Cited by
156
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
Keywords
functional electrical stimulation, peroneal nerve, hemiplegia, long-term follow-up, peripheral nerve stimulation, stroke rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation Therapy, Follow-Up Studies, Hemiplegia, Humans, Peroneal Nerve, Time Factors, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review