Cited by 53Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSocial Media in Health EducationICT in Developing Communities

Text4baby in the United States and Russia: An Opportunity for Understanding How mHealth Affects Maternal and Child Health

Parker, Ruth M., Dmitrieva, Elena, Frolov, Sergei, Gazmararian, Julie A.·2012·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

Text4baby uses new technology to deliver health messages and engage pregnant women and new mothers in healthy behaviors. The authors describe the need for carefully conducted early adopter epidemiologic evaluation and describe one such evaluation in a women, infant, and children clinic population in the United States and its proposed adaptation for use among early users of Text4baby in Russia. Collaborative efforts among countries can guide international understanding and use of best practices of this emerging technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730.2011.649162

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parker et al detailed the translation, back translation, and intelligibility testing of English text messages from the US-based Text4baby intervention, translated into Russian.

    “In addition, Parker et al [20] detailed the translation, back translation, and intelligibility testing of English text messages from the US-based Text4baby intervention, translated into Russian.”
  • Although these studies have shown the feasibility of cultural adaptation of text messaging programs in maternal health, more evaluation of such interventions is needed to determine their effectiveness.

    “Although these studies have shown the feasibility of cultural adaptation of text messaging programs in maternal health, more evaluation of such interventions is needed to determine their effectiveness [20].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, R. M., Dmitrieva, E., Frolov, S., & Gazmararian, J. A.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Parker, Ruth M.
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2012-05-02
Volume
17
Issue
sup1
Pages
30-36
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W2110711146
Cited by
53
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
mobile health, maternal and child health, pregnant women, postpartum women, early adopters, international adaptation, Russia, United States
MeSH terms
Child, Child Welfare, Female, Humans, Infant, International Cooperation, Maternal Welfare, Maternal-Child Health Centers, Pregnancy, Russia, United States, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Telemedicine, Health Communication, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review