Cited by 300Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media in Health EducationTechnology Use by Older Adults

The Influence of eHealth Literacy on Perceived Trust in Online Health Communication Channels and Sources

Open access
Paige, Samantha R., Krieger, Janice L., Stellefson, Michael L.·2017·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

Disparities in online health information accessibility are partially due to varying levels of eHealth literacy and perceived trust. This study examined the relationship between eHealth literacy and perceived trust in online health communication channels and sources among diverse sociodemographic groups. A stratified sample of Black/African Americans (n = 402) and Caucasians (n = 409) completed a Web-based survey that measured eHealth literacy and perceived trustworthiness of online health communication channels and information sources. eHealth literacy positively predicted perceived trust in online health communication channels and sources, but disparities existed by sociodemographic factors. Segmenting audiences according to eHealth literacy level provides a detailed understanding of how perceived trust in discrete online health communication channels and information sources varies among diverse audiences. Black/African Americans with low eHealth literacy had high perceived trust in YouTube and Twitter, whereas Black/African Americans with high eHealth literacy had high perceived trust in online government and religious organizations. Older adults with low eHealth literacy had high perceived trust in Facebook but low perceived trust in online support groups. Researchers and practitioners should consider the sociodemographics and eHealth literacy level of an intended audience when tailoring information through trustworthy online health communication channels and information sources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730.2016.1250846

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Robb M Shellenbarger T 2014 Influential factors and perceptions of eHealth literacy among undergraduate college students Online Journal of Nursing Informatics 18 3 Retrieved from http://www.himss.org/ResourceLibrary/GenResourceDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=33519

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paige, S. R., Krieger, J. L., & Stellefson, M. L.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Paige, Samantha R.
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2016-12-21
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
53-65
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W2561488778
Cited by
300
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5
FWCI
18.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F31HL132463)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
digital health literacy, perceived trust, online health communication, health information sources, sociodemographic disparities, African Americans, older adults, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, online support groups, audience segmentation, health information access
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Internet, Trust, Young Adult, Health Literacy, Health Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review