The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of General and Alcohol-Specific Media Literacy Training On Children's Decision Making About Alcohol
Abstract
This article examines the immediate and delayed effects of media literacy training on third-grade children's perceptions of alcohol advertising, alcohol norms, expectancies for drinking, and behaviors toward alcohol. A Solomon four-group style experiment (N = 225) with two levels of the treatment factor assessed the effectiveness of in-school media literacy training for alcohol. The experiment compared a treatment that included the viewing of a videotape about television advertising along with the viewing of video clips of alcohol ads and discussion pertaining to alcohol advertising specifically versus one that included the viewing of the same general purpose media literacy videotape along with video clips of non-alcohol advertising and then discussion of advertising in general. The treatment had both immediate and delayed effects. Immediate effects included the children's increased understanding of persuasive intent, viewing of characters as less similar to people they knew in real life and less desirable, decreased desire to be like the characters, decreased expectation of positive consequences from drinking alcohol, and decreased likelihood to choose an alcohol-related product. Indirect effects also were found on their perceptions of television's realism and their views of social norms related to alcohol. Delayed effects were examined and confirmed on expectancies and behavior. The treatment was more effective when alcohol-specific, and it also was more effective among girls than boys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The seven great debates in the media literacy movement
Hobbs, R. (1998) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/48.1.16 · Cited by 499
Media Literacy Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review
Jeong, S.-H., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x · Cited by 490
Children as Consumers: Advertising and Marketing
Calvert, S. L. (2008) · The Future of Children · doi:10.1353/foc.0.0001 · Cited by 470
Electronic Media, Violence, and Adolescents: An Emerging Public Health Problem
David-Ferdon, C., & Hertz, M. F. (2007) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.020 · Cited by 423
Buijzen, M., Van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Owen, L. H. (2010) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01370.x · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Erica W Eintraub, A. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-42
- ISSN
- 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0415
- OpenAlex
- W2125682639
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 133.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of General and Alcohol-Specific Media Literacy Training On Children's Decision Making About Alcohol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/108107397127897
- The paper
- Erica W Eintraub, A. K. (1997). Effects of General and Alcohol-Specific Media Literacy Training On Children's Decision Making About Alcohol. Journal of Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107397127897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.