Cited by 423Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsGun Ownership and Violence Research

Electronic Media, Violence, and Adolescents: An Emerging Public Health Problem

Open access
David-Ferdon, Corinne, Hertz, Marci Feldman·2007·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Adolescents' access to and use of new media technology (e.g., cell phone, personal data assistant, computer for Internet access) are on the rise, and this explosion of technology brings with it potential benefits and risks. Attention is growing about the risk of adolescents to become victims of aggression perpetrated by peers with new technology. In September 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a panel of experts in technology and youth aggression to examine this specific risk. This special issue of the Journal of Adolescent Health presents the data and recommendations for future directions discussed at the meeting. The articles in the Journal support the argument that electronic aggression is an emerging public health problem in need of additional prevalence and etiological research to support the development and evaluation of effective prevention programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.020

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nansel TR, Overpeck M, Pilla M, et al. Bullying behavior among U.S. youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA 2001;285:2094 -100.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
David-Ferdon, C., & Hertz, M. F.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
David-Ferdon, Corinne
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
S1-S5
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116167256
Cited by
423
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 31
FWCI
17.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Keywords
electronic aggression, cyberbullying, adolescents, peer aggression, new media technologies, public health, prevention programs, prevalence, etiology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Aggression, Communications Media, Diffusion of Innovation, Electronics, Humans, Public Health, Risk Factors, Schools, Violence, Global Health, Causality, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review