Cited by 46Resilience and Mental HealthSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild Welfare and Adoption

Resilience in Children of Substance Users: In Their Own Words

Moe, Jerry, Johnson, Jeannette L., Wade, Wendy·2007·Substance Use & Misuse

Abstract

Understanding what children of alcoholics and other substance users experience has dominated the scientific literature and popular press for the past several decades. To date, the empirical studies have relied primarily on quantitative data to understand the individual and environmental factors associated with the lives, the developmental trajectories, and the growth of children of alcoholics and other substance users. Many of these studies focus on their risks, and very few of them focus on their strengths. Additionally, very few studies have used qualitative techniques to collect data. While quantitative studies have given us great insight, perhaps we could learn a great deal more if we employed data collection methods which would actually provide us with the child's perception of their strengths, or resilience, and what they think it takes to grow into happy, healthy adults. For this reason, this study presents data from the interviews of 50 children of substance users who present their views on resilience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10826080601142147

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In another study, children aged 7-13 interviewed after participating in a program to support COA were clear that adults should not drink, and that tangible assets were not important.

    “The authors reported that the children were clear that adults should not drink, and that tangible assets were not important (Moe, Johnson, & Wade, 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moe, J., Johnson, J. L., & Wade, W.
Affiliations
  • Betty Ford Children's Program, The Betty Ford Center, Rancho Mirage, California, USA
  • Friends Research Institute (US)
Venue
Substance Use & Misuse
Published
2007-01
Volume
42
Issue
2-3
Pages
381-398
ISSN
  • 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2491
OpenAlex
W2025921866
Cited by
46
References
81
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Substance Use & Misuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
resilience, children of substance users, children of alcoholics, substance use, child development, strength, children's perspectives, qualitative interviews
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Alcoholism, Child, Culture, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Self Concept, Social Adjustment, Social Perception, Socialization, United States, Child of Impaired Parents, Personal Construct Theory, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review