Cited by 5Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSmoking Behavior and Cessation

The Stimulant Selective Severity Assessment: A replication and exploratory extension of the Cocaine Selective Severity Assessment

Open access
Walker, Robrina, Northrup, Thomas F., Tillitski, John, Bernstein, Ira, Greer, Tracy L., Trivedi, Madhukar H.·2019·Substance Use & Misuse

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cocaine and methamphetamine have similar withdrawal symptoms and many individuals concurrently use both substances; however, no measures concurrently assess withdrawal from multiple stimulants. OBJECTIVES: This study's aim was to explore the Stimulant Selective Severity Assessment (SSSA), a modified version of the Cocaine Selective Severity Assessment (CSSA), in a sample of stimulant users to determine if it can assess withdrawal symptoms in users of one or more stimulants. METHODS: Baseline data were analyzed from the STimulant Reduction Intervention using Dosed Exercise trial, a multisite randomized clinical trial that evaluated exercise versus health education on drug use outcomes in individuals with stimulant use disorders. Data were analyzed for internal consistency, construct validity, and scale dimensionality. RESULTS: Internal consistency for the full sample was good (α = 0.81; N = 302), with similar alphas in Cocaine (0.81; n = 177) and Cocaine/Other Stimulant (0.82; n = 92) groups, but with much lower alpha for the group without cocaine use (Other Stimulant, i.e., primarily methamphetamine, α = 0.66; n = 32). Support for construct validity was evidenced by significant positive correlations (r = 0.17 to 0.67) with measures of stimulant craving, depressive symptoms, and pain. Four factors were revealed. Conclusions/Importance: The Stimulant Selective Severity Assessment is a new measure that can be used to assess withdrawal symptoms in users of cocaine or cocaine plus methamphetamine, but it should not be administered to users of methamphetamine only.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10826084.2018.1467453

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The standard of care for adolescent and young adult SUD treatment is to use interventions specifically tailored or designed for their unique developmental stage.

    “the standard of care for adolescent-and young adult SUD treatment is to use interventions that are specifically tailored or designed for their unique developmental stage.177,178,179”

    From The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [177]

    The Introduction describes an evaluation of a stimulant-withdrawal assessment, while Methods > Procedures describes a trial of exercise versus health education as additions to usual care. Searches for adolescent and young adult treatment and developmentally appropriate interventions found no passage stating that developmentally tailored interventions are the standard of care. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, R., Northrup, T. F., Tillitski, J., Bernstein, I., Greer, T. L., & Trivedi, M. H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Walker, Robrina
Venue
Substance Use & Misuse
Published
2019-01-18
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
351-361
ISSN
  • 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2491
OpenAlex
W2910733112
Cited by
5
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Substance Use & Misuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (U10DA020024,UG1DA020024)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
cocaine dependence, methamphetamine dependence, depressive symptoms, pain, scale validation
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Cocaine, Female, Humans, Male, Methamphetamine, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Young Adult, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review